Conversion from Zettabits per second to Megaoctets per second

=

Invert

Formula to convert Zettabits per second (Zbit/s) to Megaoctets per second (Mo/s)

More information

Zettabits per second to Megaoctets per second conversion table

Zettabits per second (Zbit/s)Megaoctets per second (Mo/s)
1 Zettabit per second125000000000000 Mo/s
2 Zettabits per second250000000000000 Mo/s
3 Zettabits per second375000000000000 Mo/s
4 Zettabits per second500000000000000 Mo/s
5 Zettabits per second625000000000000 Mo/s
10 Zettabits per second1.25 × 1015 Mo/s
20 Zettabits per second2.5 × 1015 Mo/s
25 Zettabits per second3.125 × 1015 Mo/s
50 Zettabits per second6.25 × 1015 Mo/s
100 Zettabits per second1.25 × 1016 Mo/s

Data-transfer rate reference points

ReferenceZettabits per second (Zbit/s)Megaoctets per second (Mo/s)
A dial-up modem5.6 × 10-17 Zbit/s0.007 Mo/s
Typical home broadband1 × 10-13 Zbit/s12.5 Mo/s
Gigabit Ethernet1 × 10-12 Zbit/s125 Mo/s
Streaming a 4K film2.5 × 10-14 Zbit/s3.125 Mo/s

Try our other unit converters

LengthMassTemperatureEnergyVolumeSpeedTimeDataPressureFrequencyData-transfer rateVolumetric flow rateAngleArea

Information about the Zettabit per second (Zbit/s)

The zettabit per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to a thousand exabits per second. Its symbol is Zbit/s. No system on Earth moves data at this rate, and none is planned; the unit exists because the metric system defines every prefix for every unit, whether or not the combination has yet been needed.

To see how far off it is, take the whole internet. Global traffic at present runs at roughly one exabit per second on average, so the entire planet's communications would have to grow a thousandfold to reach one zettabit per second. At the growth rates of the last two decades that would take somewhere between twenty and thirty years, which is precisely the sort of extrapolation that has been wrong in both directions before.

A zettabit per second is 125 exaoctets per second. Since global data storage manufacturing runs at a few hundred exaoctets a year, a link at this rate would transfer the world's entire annual production of new storage capacity in a couple of seconds. Nothing could be stored at the far end; the data would have to be processed and discarded as it arrived.

That last point is not as fanciful as it sounds. Several existing systems already discard almost everything they receive: particle detectors, radio telescope arrays and network monitoring systems all process far more than they keep, because keeping it is impossible and unnecessary. A zettabit-per-second link would be an extreme case of an architecture that already exists.

The physical obstacles are less absolute than they might appear. The theoretical capacity of a single optical fibre is far above what is used today, and the practical limits come from amplifier noise, non-linear effects and the electronics at each end rather than from the glass itself. Aggregating enough fibres would reach a zettabit per second; the difficulty is that nobody has a reason to.

For a converter, the unit matters because forecasts and capacity models are written in whatever unit keeps the numbers legible. A projection that reaches into the 2050s may reasonably state totals in zettabits per second, and a reader needs to be able to convert that into something familiar.

One zettabit per second equals 1,000 exabits per second, 125 exaoctets per second, or about 0.8470 zebibits per second.


Information about the Megaoctet per second (Mo/s)

The megaoctet per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to one million octets per second, or eight megabits per second. Its symbol is Mo/s. It is the unit in which storage devices and their interfaces are rated, and the one a file manager shows while a copy is running.

Storage speeds fall naturally into this range. A mechanical hard drive sustains 100 to 250 megaoctets per second on sequential reads. A solid-state drive on the older interface reaches about 550, which is the limit of that interface rather than of the drive. A modern drive on the faster interface reaches several thousand, at which point the unit gives way to gigaoctets per second.

Interface speeds tell the same story from the other side. The successive versions of the universal serial bus have offered roughly 1.5, 60, 625 and 2,500 megaoctets per second at their nominal rates, and memory card standards have followed a similar path. A device is always limited by whichever of the two is slower, and matching them is the practical art of building a fast system.

For everyday sizes, one megaoctet per second transfers a photograph in a couple of seconds and a two-gigaoctet film in about half an hour. At 500 megaoctets per second the same film takes four seconds. That contrast explains why the perceived speed of a computer changed so completely when solid-state storage replaced mechanical drives, even though processors improved far less over the same period.

Sequential rates like these are the best case. Reading many small files instead of one large one costs far more, because each file requires locating its data and reading its record. A drive that sustains 500 megaoctets per second in sequence may manage only a few tens when copying a directory of thousands of small files, and that is where the difference between drive technologies is most visible.

The unit also describes the throughput of a busy network connection: a gigabit link delivers 125 megaoctets per second at best, so a fast local network and a fast drive are now comparable, and neither is obviously the limiting factor in a transfer.

One megaoctet per second equals 1,000,000 octets per second, 8 megabits per second, or about 0.9537 mebioctets per second.