| Zettabits per second (Zbit/s) | Petabits per second (Pbit/s) |
|---|---|
| 1 Zettabit per second | 1000000 Pbit/s |
| 2 Zettabits per second | 2000000 Pbit/s |
| 3 Zettabits per second | 3000000 Pbit/s |
| 4 Zettabits per second | 4000000 Pbit/s |
| 5 Zettabits per second | 5000000 Pbit/s |
| 10 Zettabits per second | 10000000 Pbit/s |
| 20 Zettabits per second | 20000000 Pbit/s |
| 25 Zettabits per second | 25000000 Pbit/s |
| 50 Zettabits per second | 50000000 Pbit/s |
| 100 Zettabits per second | 100000000 Pbit/s |
| Reference | Zettabits per second (Zbit/s) | Petabits per second (Pbit/s) |
|---|---|---|
| A dial-up modem | 5.6 × 10-17 Zbit/s | 5.6 × 10-11 Pbit/s |
| Typical home broadband | 1 × 10-13 Zbit/s | 0.0000001 Pbit/s |
| Gigabit Ethernet | 1 × 10-12 Zbit/s | 0.000001 Pbit/s |
| Streaming a 4K film | 2.5 × 10-14 Zbit/s | 0.000000025 Pbit/s |
The zettabit per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to a thousand exabits per second. Its symbol is Zbit/s. No system on Earth moves data at this rate, and none is planned; the unit exists because the metric system defines every prefix for every unit, whether or not the combination has yet been needed.
To see how far off it is, take the whole internet. Global traffic at present runs at roughly one exabit per second on average, so the entire planet's communications would have to grow a thousandfold to reach one zettabit per second. At the growth rates of the last two decades that would take somewhere between twenty and thirty years, which is precisely the sort of extrapolation that has been wrong in both directions before.
A zettabit per second is 125 exaoctets per second. Since global data storage manufacturing runs at a few hundred exaoctets a year, a link at this rate would transfer the world's entire annual production of new storage capacity in a couple of seconds. Nothing could be stored at the far end; the data would have to be processed and discarded as it arrived.
That last point is not as fanciful as it sounds. Several existing systems already discard almost everything they receive: particle detectors, radio telescope arrays and network monitoring systems all process far more than they keep, because keeping it is impossible and unnecessary. A zettabit-per-second link would be an extreme case of an architecture that already exists.
The physical obstacles are less absolute than they might appear. The theoretical capacity of a single optical fibre is far above what is used today, and the practical limits come from amplifier noise, non-linear effects and the electronics at each end rather than from the glass itself. Aggregating enough fibres would reach a zettabit per second; the difficulty is that nobody has a reason to.
For a converter, the unit matters because forecasts and capacity models are written in whatever unit keeps the numbers legible. A projection that reaches into the 2050s may reasonably state totals in zettabits per second, and a reader needs to be able to convert that into something familiar.
One zettabit per second equals 1,000 exabits per second, 125 exaoctets per second, or about 0.8470 zebibits per second.
The petabit per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to a thousand terabits per second. Its symbol is Pbit/s. It marks the frontier of optical transmission research: the rate at which laboratories have carried data down a single strand of glass, and which no deployed system yet approaches.
The records were set by combining three techniques. Multi-core fibre puts several separate light-guiding paths inside one cladding, so that a single strand behaves like a bundle. Wavelength division multiplexing runs hundreds of distinct colours down each of those cores. Advanced modulation encodes many bits into each pulse. Multiplying the three together is what reaches a petabit per second.
Such demonstrations run over tens of kilometres of fibre in controlled conditions, not the thousands of kilometres a working sea cable must span. Distance is the hard part: signals attenuate, dispersion smears pulses together, and non-linear effects in the glass grow with power. Every kilometre added makes the same rate harder to sustain, which is why deployed cables sit two orders of magnitude below the laboratory record.
In octets a petabit per second is 125 teraoctets per second, which is roughly the storage of a hundred and twenty-five large hard drives moved every second. Nothing at either end of such a link could produce or absorb data at that rate; the figure describes the medium's capacity rather than any use of it.
At the network level the unit is used for aggregates. The total interconnect capacity of a very large data centre, the summed capacity of all the cables landing on a continent, and the peak traffic of the largest content networks are quoted in petabits per second. These are sums over thousands of links, not the rating of any one.
The trajectory is worth noting. Transoceanic capacity has grown by roughly a factor of ten every seven or eight years for several decades, driven almost entirely by better electronics and better coding rather than by more glass. If that continues, the petabit per second will describe a working cable within a generation.
One petabit per second equals 1,000 terabits per second, 125 teraoctets per second, or about 0.8882 pebibits per second.