| Kibioctets per second (Kio/s) | Megaoctets per second (Mo/s) |
|---|---|
| 1 Kibioctet per second | 0.001024 Mo/s |
| 2 Kibioctets per second | 0.002048 Mo/s |
| 3 Kibioctets per second | 0.003072 Mo/s |
| 4 Kibioctets per second | 0.004096 Mo/s |
| 5 Kibioctets per second | 0.00512 Mo/s |
| 10 Kibioctets per second | 0.01024 Mo/s |
| 20 Kibioctets per second | 0.02048 Mo/s |
| 25 Kibioctets per second | 0.0256 Mo/s |
| 50 Kibioctets per second | 0.0512 Mo/s |
| 100 Kibioctets per second | 0.1024 Mo/s |
| Reference | Kibioctets per second (Kio/s) | Megaoctets per second (Mo/s) |
|---|---|---|
| A dial-up modem | 6.83594 Kio/s | 0.007 Mo/s |
| Typical home broadband | 12207 Kio/s | 12.5 Mo/s |
| Gigabit Ethernet | 122070 Kio/s | 125 Mo/s |
| Streaming a 4K film | 3051.76 Kio/s | 3.125 Mo/s |
The kibioctet per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to 1,024 octets per second, and therefore to 8,192 bits per second. Its symbol is Kio/s. Unlike most of the binary rate units it is genuinely common, because the command-line tools that copy, download and synchronise files have reported in it for decades.
The reason is straightforward. Those tools count what they have moved in blocks, and blocks are powers of two. A program that reads in four-kibioctet pieces and divides the total by elapsed time produces a rate in kibioctets per second, and reporting it in decimal kilooctets would require an extra multiplication for no benefit. The unit is what the arithmetic naturally produces.
Anyone who has watched a file copy on a Unix-like system has seen the figure. Download utilities, archive tools, disc-writing commands and network file transfer programs all report progress in kibioctets or mebioctets per second, and most of them label it correctly with the lowercase i. It is one of the few places where the IEC prefixes are used consistently in everyday software.
For scale, a kibioctet per second moves about a thousand characters of text each second: a short letter in a second, a novel in about ten minutes. It is a rate at which a modern web page will not load in any reasonable time, so seeing it in a progress display usually means something has gone wrong with the connection rather than that the transfer is nearly finished.
The difference from a kilooctet per second is 2.4 per cent, which nobody notices. The value of using the binary unit here is not accuracy but honesty: the number came from a binary computation, and writing it with a binary prefix says so. A reader who wants the decimal figure can convert; a reader given a decimal label for a binary number cannot recover anything.
Comparing the reading with an advertised connection speed requires two steps: multiply by eight to get bits, and adjust by 2.4 per cent for the base. In practice the second step is beneath the noise of any real measurement, and the first is the one that matters.
One kibioctet per second equals 1,024 octets per second, 8,192 bits per second, or 1.024 kilooctets per second.
The megaoctet per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to one million octets per second, or eight megabits per second. Its symbol is Mo/s. It is the unit in which storage devices and their interfaces are rated, and the one a file manager shows while a copy is running.
Storage speeds fall naturally into this range. A mechanical hard drive sustains 100 to 250 megaoctets per second on sequential reads. A solid-state drive on the older interface reaches about 550, which is the limit of that interface rather than of the drive. A modern drive on the faster interface reaches several thousand, at which point the unit gives way to gigaoctets per second.
Interface speeds tell the same story from the other side. The successive versions of the universal serial bus have offered roughly 1.5, 60, 625 and 2,500 megaoctets per second at their nominal rates, and memory card standards have followed a similar path. A device is always limited by whichever of the two is slower, and matching them is the practical art of building a fast system.
For everyday sizes, one megaoctet per second transfers a photograph in a couple of seconds and a two-gigaoctet film in about half an hour. At 500 megaoctets per second the same film takes four seconds. That contrast explains why the perceived speed of a computer changed so completely when solid-state storage replaced mechanical drives, even though processors improved far less over the same period.
Sequential rates like these are the best case. Reading many small files instead of one large one costs far more, because each file requires locating its data and reading its record. A drive that sustains 500 megaoctets per second in sequence may manage only a few tens when copying a directory of thousands of small files, and that is where the difference between drive technologies is most visible.
The unit also describes the throughput of a busy network connection: a gigabit link delivers 125 megaoctets per second at best, so a fast local network and a fast drive are now comparable, and neither is obviously the limiting factor in a transfer.
One megaoctet per second equals 1,000,000 octets per second, 8 megabits per second, or about 0.9537 mebioctets per second.