Conversion from Pebioctets per second to Petabits per second

=

Invert

Formula to convert Pebioctets per second (Pio/s) to Petabits per second (Pbit/s)

More information

Pebioctets per second to Petabits per second conversion table

Pebioctets per second (Pio/s)Petabits per second (Pbit/s)
1 Pebioctet per second9.00719925474 Pbit/s
2 Pebioctets per second18.0143985095 Pbit/s
3 Pebioctets per second27.0215977642 Pbit/s
4 Pebioctets per second36.028797019 Pbit/s
5 Pebioctets per second45.0359962737 Pbit/s
10 Pebioctets per second90.0719925474 Pbit/s
20 Pebioctets per second180.143985095 Pbit/s
25 Pebioctets per second225.179981369 Pbit/s
50 Pebioctets per second450.359962737 Pbit/s
100 Pebioctets per second900.719925474 Pbit/s

Data-transfer rate reference points

ReferencePebioctets per second (Pio/s)Petabits per second (Pbit/s)
A dial-up modem6.21725 × 10-12 Pio/s5.6 × 10-11 Pbit/s
Typical home broadband0.0000000111022 Pio/s0.0000001 Pbit/s
Gigabit Ethernet0.000000111022 Pio/s0.000001 Pbit/s
Streaming a 4K film0.00000000277556 Pio/s0.000000025 Pbit/s

Try our other unit converters

LengthMassTemperatureEnergyVolumeSpeedTimeDataPressureFrequencyData-transfer rateVolumetric flow rateAngleArea

Information about the Pebioctet per second (Pio/s)

The pebioctet per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to 1,024 tebioctets per second, or two to the fiftieth power octets per second. Its symbol is Pio/s. It is the binary counterpart of the petaoctet per second, and the two differ by 12.6 per cent.

The rate exists only as a total. The aggregate memory bandwidth of a whole supercomputer, or the summed capacity of the network fabric joining its cabinets, reaches this range, and both are sums over tens of thousands of components, each of which moves a few hundred gibioctets per second on its own.

Whether such a total means anything depends on the calculation being run. A problem that divides so that each node works mostly on its own data can use the full aggregate. A problem where every node must constantly consult every other cannot, and the machine's effective bandwidth falls to what the slowest shared path allows. Most of the art of parallel programming lies in getting problems into the first category.

In octets a pebioctet per second is 1,125,899,906,842,624, and in decimal terms about 1.126 petaoctets per second. The 12.6 per cent difference is the accumulated effect of five multiplications by 1.024, and it is now large enough that no report can leave the convention unstated without introducing real uncertainty.

The unit also appears in descriptions of parallel filesystems at the largest facilities, where a storage system spread across tens of thousands of drives delivers a few pebioctets per second to a compute cluster. That number determines how quickly the machine can checkpoint its state, which in turn determines how much work is lost when a component fails — and in a machine of that size, something is always failing.

For a converter the requirement is simply that the arithmetic be exact and the label preserved. Multiplying by 1,024 five times is not difficult; silently substituting the decimal prefix is the error to avoid.

One pebioctet per second equals 1,024 tebioctets per second, 1,125,899,906,842,624 octets per second, or about 1.126 petaoctets per second.


Information about the Petabit per second (Pbit/s)

The petabit per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to a thousand terabits per second. Its symbol is Pbit/s. It marks the frontier of optical transmission research: the rate at which laboratories have carried data down a single strand of glass, and which no deployed system yet approaches.

The records were set by combining three techniques. Multi-core fibre puts several separate light-guiding paths inside one cladding, so that a single strand behaves like a bundle. Wavelength division multiplexing runs hundreds of distinct colours down each of those cores. Advanced modulation encodes many bits into each pulse. Multiplying the three together is what reaches a petabit per second.

Such demonstrations run over tens of kilometres of fibre in controlled conditions, not the thousands of kilometres a working sea cable must span. Distance is the hard part: signals attenuate, dispersion smears pulses together, and non-linear effects in the glass grow with power. Every kilometre added makes the same rate harder to sustain, which is why deployed cables sit two orders of magnitude below the laboratory record.

In octets a petabit per second is 125 teraoctets per second, which is roughly the storage of a hundred and twenty-five large hard drives moved every second. Nothing at either end of such a link could produce or absorb data at that rate; the figure describes the medium's capacity rather than any use of it.

At the network level the unit is used for aggregates. The total interconnect capacity of a very large data centre, the summed capacity of all the cables landing on a continent, and the peak traffic of the largest content networks are quoted in petabits per second. These are sums over thousands of links, not the rating of any one.

The trajectory is worth noting. Transoceanic capacity has grown by roughly a factor of ten every seven or eight years for several decades, driven almost entirely by better electronics and better coding rather than by more glass. If that continues, the petabit per second will describe a working cable within a generation.

One petabit per second equals 1,000 terabits per second, 125 teraoctets per second, or about 0.8882 pebibits per second.