| Megaliters (ML) | Fluid ounces (fl oz) |
|---|---|
| 1 Megaliter | 35195079.7279 fl oz |
| 2 Megaliters | 70390159.4557 fl oz |
| 3 Megaliters | 105585239.184 fl oz |
| 4 Megaliters | 140780318.911 fl oz |
| 5 Megaliters | 175975398.639 fl oz |
| 10 Megaliters | 351950797.279 fl oz |
| 20 Megaliters | 703901594.557 fl oz |
| 25 Megaliters | 879876993.196 fl oz |
| 50 Megaliters | 1759753986.39 fl oz |
| 100 Megaliters | 3519507972.79 fl oz |
| Reference | Megaliters (ML) | Fluid ounces (fl oz) |
|---|---|---|
| A teaspoon | 0.000000005 ML | 0.175975 fl oz |
| A can of soft drink | 0.00000033 ML | 11.6144 fl oz |
| A wine bottle | 0.00000075 ML | 26.3963 fl oz |
| A bathtub | 0.00015 ML | 5279.26 fl oz |
| An Olympic swimming pool | 2.5 ML | 87987699 fl oz |
The megalitre is a unit of volume equal to one million litres, or one thousand cubic metres. Its symbol is ML. It is the working unit of water management: irrigation entitlements, treatment works capacity, farm dams and the trading of water rights are all counted in megalitres, because the quantities involved are far too large for litres and awkwardly small for cubic kilometres.
Australia has made the most of it. Irrigation water in the Murray-Darling Basin is held as entitlements measured in megalitres, seasonal allocations are announced as a percentage of those entitlements, and the resulting rights are traded on an open market where prices are quoted in dollars per megalitre. That market is among the largest of its kind in the world, and every price in it is a price per million litres.
British water utilities use it for throughput. A treatment works is rated in megalitres per day, distribution zones are balanced in the same unit, and leakage is reported as megalitres lost daily across a network. Because a large city consumes several hundred megalitres a day, the unit keeps national and regional figures in three or four digits rather than in unreadable strings of zeros.
A familiar object fixes the scale. An Olympic swimming pool of fifty metres by twenty-five, filled to two metres, holds 2500 cubic metres, which is two and a half megalitres. Journalism uses that comparison constantly for reservoir levels and flood volumes, and it works precisely because the pool and the unit are within a factor of three of each other.
On farms the unit describes storage. An Australian farm dam might hold anything from five to fifty megalitres, an on-farm irrigation season is planned in megalitres per hectare, and evaporation losses from open storage are estimated the same way. Sewage treatment, industrial process water and mine site water balances all follow.
Its one hazard is typographic. In the correct symbols, mL is a millilitre and ML is a megalitre, and the two differ by a factor of a thousand million. A document that is careless about capitals can therefore turn a laboratory volume into a reservoir, which is why water and clinical writing both insist on the case being right.
One megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres, 1000 cubic metres, about 264,172 US gallons, or about 220,000 imperial gallons.
The fluid ounce in the imperial system is a unit of volume equal to exactly 28.4130625 millilitres. Its symbol is fl oz. Twenty of them make an imperial pint and 160 an imperial gallon. It is the smallest unit of the imperial liquid chain in ordinary use, and its name records exactly what it was built to do.
The name is literal. The Weights and Measures Act of 1824 defined the fluid ounce as the volume occupied by one avoirdupois ounce of water, so a fluid ounce of water weighs an ounce. The modern definition is metric and the agreement is no longer exact, but it is close: a fluid ounce of water weighs 28.4 grams against the ounce's 28.35, a difference of two parts in a thousand.
The United States fluid ounce is a different quantity, and the relationship between the two is the most confusing pair of units in either system. A United States fluid ounce is 29.5735 millilitres, so it is four per cent larger than the imperial one. Yet a United States pint contains only sixteen of them where an imperial pint contains twenty, so the American pint ends up seventeen per cent smaller. The smaller unit belongs to the larger system and the larger unit to the smaller.
That reversal has practical consequences. A recipe calling for eight fluid ounces of milk means 237 millilitres in America and 227 in Britain, which is tolerable, but one calling for a pint means 473 or 568, which is not. Cosmetics, medicines and drinks all carry both figures on internationally sold packaging for exactly this reason.
British labelling now leads with millilitres. Toiletries, spirits and soft drinks are specified in metric units, with fluid ounces printed alongside for markets that expect them, and pharmacy long ago abandoned the fluid ounce and the fluid dram in favour of millilitres. What survives is culinary and conversational rather than legal.
Where an old British recipe uses it, the conversion is straightforward as long as the system is known: multiply by 28.4 for millilitres, and remember that the pint above it holds twenty and not sixteen. Getting the pint right matters more than getting the ounce right, because the error compounds with quantity.
One imperial fluid ounce equals 28.4130625 millilitres, 1/20 of an imperial pint, or about 0.961 US fluid ounces.