| Megabits (Mbit) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|
| 1 Megabit | 1.25 × 10-19 Yo |
| 2 Megabits | 2.5 × 10-19 Yo |
| 3 Megabits | 3.75 × 10-19 Yo |
| 4 Megabits | 5 × 10-19 Yo |
| 5 Megabits | 6.25 × 10-19 Yo |
| 10 Megabits | 1.25 × 10-18 Yo |
| 20 Megabits | 2.5 × 10-18 Yo |
| 25 Megabits | 3.125 × 10-18 Yo |
| 50 Megabits | 6.25 × 10-18 Yo |
| 100 Megabits | 1.25 × 10-17 Yo |
| Reference | Megabits (Mbit) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 0.00128 Mbit | 1.6 × 10-22 Yo |
| A three-minute MP3 | 24 Mbit | 3 × 10-18 Yo |
| A smartphone photo | 32 Mbit | 4 × 10-18 Yo |
| A high-definition film | 32000 Mbit | 4 × 10-15 Yo |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 400000 Mbit | 5 × 10-14 Yo |
The megabit is a unit of digital information equal to one million bits. Its symbol is Mbit. It is the unit in which the speed of an internet connection is almost always advertised, which makes it one of the few data units that ordinary consumers encounter by name every time they choose a service.
A megabit is one million bits exactly, not 1,048,576. That distinction has practical consequences. A megabit holds 125,000 octets, which is 125 kilooctets, so a connection running at 100 megabits per second transfers about 12.5 megaoctets per second at best. A file listed as 500 megaoctets therefore takes a minimum of forty seconds, not the four the advertised number seems to promise.
That factor of eight is the reason so many people believe their connection is slower than they were sold. Nothing dishonest is happening: the industry quotes throughput in bits per second because that is what the physical layer actually carries, while file managers quote size in octets because that is how storage is organised. Both conventions are correct in their own domain, and the arithmetic between them is a division by eight.
Real throughput is lower still. Protocol headers, error correction and retransmission all consume capacity, and the usable share of a link is typically 90 to 95 per cent of its nominal rate. Wireless links lose more, because the medium is shared and interference forces retries. A connection advertised at 100 megabits per second commonly delivers 90 or so in practice, and less over a busy wireless network.
The numbers that define the eras are worth remembering. Early broadband offered 1 to 8 megabits per second, cable and fibre pushed that to 50 and 100, and gigabit services are now common in cities. High-definition video streaming needs roughly 5 megabits per second, ultra-high-definition roughly 25, and a video call between two 8, so a household's real requirement is usually far below what it buys.
In memory the megabit describes chip capacity. A 512-megabit memory chip holds 64 megaoctets, and several such chips make a module. Manufacturers count in bits because that is what the silicon holds; buyers count in octets because that is what the operating system reports.
One megabit equals 1,000,000 bits, 1,000 kilobits, 125 kilooctets, or about 0.9537 mebibits.
The yottaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand zettaoctets, or a septillion octets — a one followed by twenty-four zeros. Its symbol is Yo. Nothing that exists is measured in yottaoctets; the unit describes a quantity of data the world has not yet produced.
The total data held by humanity is currently estimated in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, so the world is a small fraction of the way to its first yottaoctet. On the growth rates of the last two decades, that threshold would be crossed sometime in the 2040s, though every long-range forecast in this field has been wrong in both directions.
The physical obstacles are severe. At the storage densities of current hard drives, a yottaoctet would need something like a hundred billion units. Manufacturing them at present rates would take centuries, powering them would need the electrical output of many countries, and housing them would require a building programme without precedent. The number is not absurd, but it is far beyond the current industrial base.
Research into higher-density storage exists partly because of this ceiling. DNA data storage, which encodes information in synthetic genetic sequences, offers densities millions of times higher than magnetic media, and a yottaoctet of DNA would fit in a room rather than a continent. Reading and writing it remain slow and costly, but the density argument is what keeps the field funded.
The yottaoctet also appears in claims that turn out to be exaggerated. Reports that intelligence agencies were building yottaoctet-scale facilities circulated widely in the 2010s and were not supported by the construction, the power supply or the storage market. Any claim about a yottaoctet of anything can be checked against total world manufacturing, which is a useful discipline.
Between 1991 and 2022 the yotta prefix was the top of the metric ladder, which is why it was the natural unit for speculative claims. The addition of ronna and quetta in 2022 gave the system three more decimal orders above it, and it is telling that this was done partly because data quantities were approaching the old ceiling.
One yottaoctet equals 1,000 zettaoctets, 1,000,000,000,000,000 gigaoctets, 8 yottabits, or about 0.8272 yobioctets.