| Tebibits per second (Tibit/s) | Exaoctets per second (Eo/s) |
|---|---|
| 1 Tebibit per second | 0.000000137438953472 Eo/s |
| 2 Tebibits per second | 0.000000274877906944 Eo/s |
| 3 Tebibits per second | 0.000000412316860416 Eo/s |
| 4 Tebibits per second | 0.000000549755813888 Eo/s |
| 5 Tebibits per second | 0.00000068719476736 Eo/s |
| 10 Tebibits per second | 0.00000137438953472 Eo/s |
| 20 Tebibits per second | 0.00000274877906944 Eo/s |
| 25 Tebibits per second | 0.0000034359738368 Eo/s |
| 50 Tebibits per second | 0.0000068719476736 Eo/s |
| 100 Tebibits per second | 0.0000137438953472 Eo/s |
| Reference | Tebibits per second (Tibit/s) | Exaoctets per second (Eo/s) |
|---|---|---|
| A dial-up modem | 0.0000000509317 Tibit/s | 7 × 10-15 Eo/s |
| Typical home broadband | 0.0000909495 Tibit/s | 1.25 × 10-11 Eo/s |
| Gigabit Ethernet | 0.000909495 Tibit/s | 1.25 × 10-10 Eo/s |
| Streaming a 4K film | 0.0000227374 Tibit/s | 3.125 × 10-12 Eo/s |
The tebibit per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to 1,099,511,627,776 bits per second, which is 1,024 gibibits per second. Its symbol is Tibit/s. It is the binary counterpart of the terabit per second, and the two differ by 10 per cent.
Ten per cent is the point at which the distinction becomes a matter of money rather than of pedantry. A supplier quoting a system at a hundred terabits per second and a customer measuring a hundred tebibits per second are not describing the same performance, and the difference is ten terabits — more than most organisations' entire external connectivity.
The rate belongs to the interior of very large machines. The aggregate memory bandwidth of a rack of accelerators, or the internal switching capacity of a large network chip, reaches this range, and both are built from power-of-two structures: memory channels of fixed binary width, switch ports in powers of two, buffers sized in binary. Expressing their totals with binary prefixes preserves the arithmetic that produced them.
In octets a tebibit per second is 137,438,953,472, or 128 gibioctets per second. That is more than any single storage device can supply and more than any external cable carries. It is a figure that describes something happening inside a cabinet, between chips connected by short traces on a board, where the physical distance is measured in centimetres.
Optical research also brushes this range. A laboratory demonstration carrying a petabit per second down one fibre is a thousand times higher, but individual wavelength channels and the electronics driving them work at tebibit-scale aggregates, and papers reporting them often state the binary figure because the underlying frame sizes are binary.
The habit of writing the lowercase i is worth keeping even where the reader is unlikely to check. A number written unambiguously can be converted correctly by anyone who reads it later; one written ambiguously cannot be repaired, and at ten per cent the ambiguity is no longer harmless.
One tebibit per second equals 1,024 gibibits per second, 137,438,953,472 octets per second, or about 1.100 terabits per second.
The exaoctet per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to a thousand petaoctets per second, or eight exabits per second. Its symbol is Eo/s. Nothing built runs at this rate: it is about eight times the total traffic of the entire internet, counted across every network on the planet at once.
The unit is useful mainly for thought experiments about limits. If every hard drive and flash chip manufactured in a year were read simultaneously at full speed, the combined rate would be in this range. So would the total output of every camera sensor in every phone on Earth if they all recorded at once. These are sums over the whole world's hardware, not rates any system experiences.
There is one situation in which very large data volumes really do move faster than any network, and it puts the unit in perspective. Physically shipping a container of hard drives across an ocean transfers more data per second, averaged over the journey, than any cable. A shipping container holding a few exaoctets crossing the Atlantic in a week works out to several gigaoctets per second, and a truck of drives driven across a city beats almost any local link.
That calculation is not a joke; cloud providers offer it as a service. When a customer needs to move petaoctets into a data centre, the provider ships a lorry full of storage rather than attempting the transfer over a network, because the network would take months. The bandwidth of a vehicle is enormous, though its latency is measured in days.
For the unit itself, an exaoctet per second is 125 petaoctets per second, and it would transfer the world's entire stock of stored data — a few hundred zettaoctets — in about a week of continuous running. No mechanism exists to feed such a link, and none is being designed.
A converter must nevertheless handle the unit, because it appears in aggregate capacity models, in academic papers on the theoretical limits of communication, and in any table that lists the metric prefixes completely. A quantity does not need a use for its name to be well formed.
One exaoctet per second equals 1,000 petaoctets per second, 8 exabits per second, or about 0.8674 exbioctets per second.