| Yottabits (Ybit) | Kilooctets (ko) |
|---|---|
| 1 Yottabit | 1.25 × 1020 ko |
| 2 Yottabits | 2.5 × 1020 ko |
| 3 Yottabits | 3.75 × 1020 ko |
| 4 Yottabits | 5 × 1020 ko |
| 5 Yottabits | 6.25 × 1020 ko |
| 10 Yottabits | 1.25 × 1021 ko |
| 20 Yottabits | 2.5 × 1021 ko |
| 25 Yottabits | 3.125 × 1021 ko |
| 50 Yottabits | 6.25 × 1021 ko |
| 100 Yottabits | 1.25 × 1022 ko |
| Reference | Yottabits (Ybit) | Kilooctets (ko) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.28 × 10-21 Ybit | 0.16 ko |
| A three-minute MP3 | 2.4 × 10-17 Ybit | 3000 ko |
| A smartphone photo | 3.2 × 10-17 Ybit | 4000 ko |
| A high-definition film | 3.2 × 10-14 Ybit | 4000000 ko |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 4 × 10-13 Ybit | 50000000 ko |
The yottabit is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand zettabits — a one followed by twenty-four zeros. Its symbol is Ybit. For thirty years it was the largest unit the metric system offered, and it describes a quantity of data that does not yet exist anywhere.
A yottabit is 125 zettaoctets. The total of all data held by humanity is currently estimated in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, so the world's entire stock of information is somewhere around one or two yottabits. It is the first data unit that is genuinely larger than the thing it might describe, which is what makes it interesting.
The prefix yotta was adopted in 1991 at the 19th General Conference on Weights and Measures, alongside zetta. The names were invented rather than derived: the Greek and Latin numerals had been used up by peta and exa, and the committee needed letters that were not already taken as unit symbols. Y and Z were among the few remaining, and the syllables were built around them.
For a long time the yotta prefix marked the top of the ladder, and it appeared mainly in speculation and in claims about intelligence agencies' storage plans that turned out to be exaggerated. Then in 2022 the General Conference added ronna and quetta above it, together with ronto and quecto below, because data quantities were rising fast enough that the top was in sight.
Reaching a yottaoctet of storage with current technology would be a physical undertaking. Even at the highest densities available, it would require hundreds of millions of the largest hard drives ever made, a power supply comparable to that of a small country, and a building programme lasting decades. The constraint is not the mathematics but the silicon and the electricity.
The unit is nevertheless properly defined and a converter must handle it, both because forecasts of future data growth are written in yottaoctets and because the metric system's rule is that every prefix applies to every unit. A quantity does not need to exist for its name to be well formed.
One yottabit equals 1,000 zettabits, 125 zettaoctets, or about 0.8272 yobibits.
The kilooctet is a unit of digital information equal to one thousand octets, and therefore to eight thousand bits. Its symbol is ko. It is the smallest of the everyday storage units, and for two decades it was the unit in which the whole capacity of a computer was described.
A kilooctet holds a thousand characters of unaccented text, which is about two hundred words, or a third of a page. The plain-text file of a short letter is a few kilooctets. Almost nothing else in modern computing is this small: an empty document from a word processor is already tens of kilooctets, because the file format carries formatting, fonts and metadata around the text.
The historical importance of the unit is hard to overstate. The Apple II shipped with 4 kilooctets of memory, the Commodore 64 was named for its 64, and the first IBM personal computer could address 640. Programs of real complexity — spreadsheets, word processors, games with graphics and sound — were written to fit inside those numbers, which required a discipline that has largely disappeared.
The kilooctet is also where the decimal and binary confusion began. Memory came in 1,024-octet units because addressing is binary, and everyone called that a kilooctet. Disc manufacturers counted in true thousands. The two conventions differ by 2.4 per cent, which was negligible at this scale, but the same error compounds at each step upward and reaches 10 per cent by the teraoctet.
The IEC resolved the ambiguity in 1998 by defining the kibioctet as 1,024 octets and leaving the kilooctet at exactly 1,000. Operating systems have adopted this unevenly: some report file sizes in true kilooctets, others still divide by 1,024 while writing ko, and a few now write Kio correctly.
Where the unit still appears daily is in network protocols and in the sizes of small resources on the web. A web page's stylesheet, an icon, a certificate, a configuration file, a database index page — all of these are measured in kilooctets, and the standard memory page on most processors is 4 kibioctets, close enough to 4 kilooctets for casual conversation but not for arithmetic.
One kilooctet equals 1,000 octets, 8,000 bits, 8 kilobits, or about 0.9766 kibioctets.