| Kilooctets (ko) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|
| 1 Kilooctet | 1 × 10-21 Yo |
| 2 Kilooctets | 2 × 10-21 Yo |
| 3 Kilooctets | 3 × 10-21 Yo |
| 4 Kilooctets | 4 × 10-21 Yo |
| 5 Kilooctets | 5 × 10-21 Yo |
| 10 Kilooctets | 1 × 10-20 Yo |
| 20 Kilooctets | 2 × 10-20 Yo |
| 25 Kilooctets | 2.5 × 10-20 Yo |
| 50 Kilooctets | 5 × 10-20 Yo |
| 100 Kilooctets | 1 × 10-19 Yo |
| Reference | Kilooctets (ko) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 0.16 ko | 1.6 × 10-22 Yo |
| A three-minute MP3 | 3000 ko | 3 × 10-18 Yo |
| A smartphone photo | 4000 ko | 4 × 10-18 Yo |
| A high-definition film | 4000000 ko | 4 × 10-15 Yo |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 50000000 ko | 5 × 10-14 Yo |
The kilooctet is a unit of digital information equal to one thousand octets, and therefore to eight thousand bits. Its symbol is ko. It is the smallest of the everyday storage units, and for two decades it was the unit in which the whole capacity of a computer was described.
A kilooctet holds a thousand characters of unaccented text, which is about two hundred words, or a third of a page. The plain-text file of a short letter is a few kilooctets. Almost nothing else in modern computing is this small: an empty document from a word processor is already tens of kilooctets, because the file format carries formatting, fonts and metadata around the text.
The historical importance of the unit is hard to overstate. The Apple II shipped with 4 kilooctets of memory, the Commodore 64 was named for its 64, and the first IBM personal computer could address 640. Programs of real complexity — spreadsheets, word processors, games with graphics and sound — were written to fit inside those numbers, which required a discipline that has largely disappeared.
The kilooctet is also where the decimal and binary confusion began. Memory came in 1,024-octet units because addressing is binary, and everyone called that a kilooctet. Disc manufacturers counted in true thousands. The two conventions differ by 2.4 per cent, which was negligible at this scale, but the same error compounds at each step upward and reaches 10 per cent by the teraoctet.
The IEC resolved the ambiguity in 1998 by defining the kibioctet as 1,024 octets and leaving the kilooctet at exactly 1,000. Operating systems have adopted this unevenly: some report file sizes in true kilooctets, others still divide by 1,024 while writing ko, and a few now write Kio correctly.
Where the unit still appears daily is in network protocols and in the sizes of small resources on the web. A web page's stylesheet, an icon, a certificate, a configuration file, a database index page — all of these are measured in kilooctets, and the standard memory page on most processors is 4 kibioctets, close enough to 4 kilooctets for casual conversation but not for arithmetic.
One kilooctet equals 1,000 octets, 8,000 bits, 8 kilobits, or about 0.9766 kibioctets.
The yottaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand zettaoctets, or a septillion octets — a one followed by twenty-four zeros. Its symbol is Yo. Nothing that exists is measured in yottaoctets; the unit describes a quantity of data the world has not yet produced.
The total data held by humanity is currently estimated in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, so the world is a small fraction of the way to its first yottaoctet. On the growth rates of the last two decades, that threshold would be crossed sometime in the 2040s, though every long-range forecast in this field has been wrong in both directions.
The physical obstacles are severe. At the storage densities of current hard drives, a yottaoctet would need something like a hundred billion units. Manufacturing them at present rates would take centuries, powering them would need the electrical output of many countries, and housing them would require a building programme without precedent. The number is not absurd, but it is far beyond the current industrial base.
Research into higher-density storage exists partly because of this ceiling. DNA data storage, which encodes information in synthetic genetic sequences, offers densities millions of times higher than magnetic media, and a yottaoctet of DNA would fit in a room rather than a continent. Reading and writing it remain slow and costly, but the density argument is what keeps the field funded.
The yottaoctet also appears in claims that turn out to be exaggerated. Reports that intelligence agencies were building yottaoctet-scale facilities circulated widely in the 2010s and were not supported by the construction, the power supply or the storage market. Any claim about a yottaoctet of anything can be checked against total world manufacturing, which is a useful discipline.
Between 1991 and 2022 the yotta prefix was the top of the metric ladder, which is why it was the natural unit for speculative claims. The addition of ronna and quetta in 2022 gave the system three more decimal orders above it, and it is telling that this was done partly because data quantities were approaching the old ceiling.
One yottaoctet equals 1,000 zettaoctets, 1,000,000,000,000,000 gigaoctets, 8 yottabits, or about 0.8272 yobioctets.