| Kilooctets (ko) | Kibibits (Kibit) |
|---|---|
| 1 Kilooctet | 7.8125 Kibit |
| 2 Kilooctets | 15.625 Kibit |
| 3 Kilooctets | 23.4375 Kibit |
| 4 Kilooctets | 31.25 Kibit |
| 5 Kilooctets | 39.0625 Kibit |
| 10 Kilooctets | 78.125 Kibit |
| 20 Kilooctets | 156.25 Kibit |
| 25 Kilooctets | 195.3125 Kibit |
| 50 Kilooctets | 390.625 Kibit |
| 100 Kilooctets | 781.25 Kibit |
| Reference | Kilooctets (ko) | Kibibits (Kibit) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 0.16 ko | 1.25 Kibit |
| A three-minute MP3 | 3000 ko | 23437.5 Kibit |
| A smartphone photo | 4000 ko | 31250 Kibit |
| A high-definition film | 4000000 ko | 31250000 Kibit |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 50000000 ko | 390625000 Kibit |
The kilooctet is a unit of digital information equal to one thousand octets, and therefore to eight thousand bits. Its symbol is ko. It is the smallest of the everyday storage units, and for two decades it was the unit in which the whole capacity of a computer was described.
A kilooctet holds a thousand characters of unaccented text, which is about two hundred words, or a third of a page. The plain-text file of a short letter is a few kilooctets. Almost nothing else in modern computing is this small: an empty document from a word processor is already tens of kilooctets, because the file format carries formatting, fonts and metadata around the text.
The historical importance of the unit is hard to overstate. The Apple II shipped with 4 kilooctets of memory, the Commodore 64 was named for its 64, and the first IBM personal computer could address 640. Programs of real complexity — spreadsheets, word processors, games with graphics and sound — were written to fit inside those numbers, which required a discipline that has largely disappeared.
The kilooctet is also where the decimal and binary confusion began. Memory came in 1,024-octet units because addressing is binary, and everyone called that a kilooctet. Disc manufacturers counted in true thousands. The two conventions differ by 2.4 per cent, which was negligible at this scale, but the same error compounds at each step upward and reaches 10 per cent by the teraoctet.
The IEC resolved the ambiguity in 1998 by defining the kibioctet as 1,024 octets and leaving the kilooctet at exactly 1,000. Operating systems have adopted this unevenly: some report file sizes in true kilooctets, others still divide by 1,024 while writing ko, and a few now write Kio correctly.
Where the unit still appears daily is in network protocols and in the sizes of small resources on the web. A web page's stylesheet, an icon, a certificate, a configuration file, a database index page — all of these are measured in kilooctets, and the standard memory page on most processors is 4 kibioctets, close enough to 4 kilooctets for casual conversation but not for arithmetic.
One kilooctet equals 1,000 octets, 8,000 bits, 8 kilobits, or about 0.9766 kibioctets.
The kibibit is a unit of digital information equal to 1,024 bits. Its symbol is Kibit. It is the first of the binary prefixes, a set of units defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission in 1998 to end a confusion that had run through computing since the 1960s.
The problem was straightforward. Computers address memory in powers of two, so memory came in chunks of 1,024 rather than 1,000. Engineers borrowed the metric prefix kilo for that quantity because 1,024 is close to 1,000, and for small numbers the approximation was harmless. But storage and transmission counted in true thousands, so the same prefix meant two different things depending on which part of the machine was being described.
The IEC's solution was to coin new names. Kibi is a contraction of kilo binary, and the pattern continues with mebi, gibi, tebi, pebi, exbi, zebi and yobi. Each is 1,024 times the one below, and each symbol takes the form of a capital letter followed by a lowercase i: Ki, Mi, Gi, Ti and so on. The kilobit then means one thousand bits and nothing else.
A kibibit is 128 octets, and the gap from a kilobit is 2.4 per cent. That small difference is why the two were confused for so long: at this scale nobody notices. The error compounds by 2.4 per cent at every step, reaching 5 per cent at the mebibit, 7 per cent at the gibibit and 21 per cent by the yobibit, which is where the ambiguity became genuinely expensive.
Adoption has been partial and uneven. Standards bodies, the Linux kernel and most technical documentation use the IEC prefixes correctly. Consumer software largely does not, and many programs still write KB while dividing by 1,024. The result is that a reader must often infer from context which convention a number follows, which is exactly what the standard was written to prevent.
In practice the kibibit itself appears mainly in the specifications of small memory chips, in serial memory used by embedded systems, and in protocol documents where an exact power of two matters. Anywhere the number 1,024 is meant rather than 1,000, this is the correct unit.
One kibibit equals 1,024 bits, 128 octets, or 1.024 kilobits.