| Nanoliters (nL) | US Liquid pints (pt) |
|---|---|
| 1 Nanoliter | 0.00000000211337641887 pt |
| 2 Nanoliters | 0.00000000422675283773 pt |
| 3 Nanoliters | 0.0000000063401292566 pt |
| 4 Nanoliters | 0.00000000845350567546 pt |
| 5 Nanoliters | 0.0000000105668820943 pt |
| 10 Nanoliters | 0.0000000211337641887 pt |
| 20 Nanoliters | 0.0000000422675283773 pt |
| 25 Nanoliters | 0.0000000528344104716 pt |
| 50 Nanoliters | 0.000000105668820943 pt |
| 100 Nanoliters | 0.000000211337641887 pt |
| Reference | Nanoliters (nL) | US Liquid pints (pt) |
|---|---|---|
| A teaspoon | 5000000 nL | 0.0105669 pt |
| A can of soft drink | 330000000 nL | 0.697414 pt |
| A wine bottle | 750000000 nL | 1.58503 pt |
| A bathtub | 1.5 × 1011 nL | 317.006 pt |
| An Olympic swimming pool | 2.5 × 1015 nL | 5283441 pt |
The nanolitre is a unit of volume equal to one billionth of a litre, written nL. It is a thousandth of a microlitre, and a nanolitre of water has a mass of one microgram. It is the scale at which liquid handling stops being a matter of pipettes and becomes a matter of engineered channels, printed droplets and acoustic pulses.
Microfluidics is built here. A lab-on-a-chip moves samples through channels a few tens of micrometres wide, so the volume inside any one segment is measured in nanolitres, and a whole analysis may consume less than a microlitre. Working at this scale changes the physics as well as the quantity: surface tension dominates gravity, flows stay orderly rather than turbulent, and mixing has to be engineered rather than assumed.
Digital polymerase chain reaction shows what the scale buys. A sample is divided into around twenty thousand droplets of roughly one nanolitre each, every droplet is amplified separately, and the number that come out positive gives an absolute count of target molecules rather than a relative measurement. Dividing a microlitre into thousands of countable compartments is only possible because a nanolitre is small enough to hold either one target molecule or none.
Drug screening moves liquid without touching it. Acoustic dispensers use a focused sound pulse to eject droplets of two and a half nanolitres from an open well, with no tip and therefore no cross-contamination and no plastic waste. A screening plate of fifteen hundred wells can be filled with distinct compounds in a few minutes at this volume.
Printing and spotting work at the same magnitude. A microarray spot holds between half a nanolitre and five, an inkjet droplet is a few picolitres so a nanolitre is several hundred drops, and single-cell platforms encapsulate individual cells in droplets of this size because a mammalian cell occupies only a few picolitres.
Handling nanolitres reliably is mostly a fight against evaporation. A one-nanolitre droplet exposed to air can lose a measurable fraction of itself in seconds, so devices at this scale work under oil, in sealed channels or in humidity-controlled enclosures, and that constraint shapes the instruments more than the dispensing itself does.
One nanolitre equals 0.001 microlitres, 0.000001 millilitres, 0.001 cubic millimetres, or 1,000,000 cubic micrometres.
The United States liquid pint is a unit of volume equal to exactly 473.176473 millilitres. Its symbol is pt. It is sixteen United States fluid ounces and an eighth of a United States gallon. It is noticeably smaller than the imperial pint of 568 millilitres, because the American pint holds sixteen fluid ounces where the British one holds twenty.
That difference of four ounces is the whole story of the two pints. Both systems descend from the same medieval English measures, but Britain rebuilt its liquid chain in 1824 around a gallon of ten pounds of water, while the United States kept the older wine gallon of 231 cubic inches. The pint inherited the difference, and a British pint is now about a fifth larger than an American one.
The rhyme survives because the American pint fits it. A pint's a pound the world around works for the United States pint, since sixteen fluid ounces of water weigh 1.04 pounds, and it fails in Britain, where a pint of water weighs a pound and a quarter. The saying is a useful reminder that measurement rhymes travel worse than the measurements themselves.
Draught beer is where the difference becomes visible to travellers, and where American practice is looser than British. There is no federal requirement that a glass sold as a pint contain a pint, and the widely used sixteen-ounce shaker glass holds that volume only when filled to the brim, so a poured beer with a head contains less. Several states have legislated on the point precisely because the imperial system's verified glass has no American equivalent.
Domestic packaging uses it constantly. Milk, cream, ice cream and soft fruit are sold in pint containers, and a donated unit of blood is loosely called a pint although it is about 470 millilitres. Premium ice cream in a pint tub is one of the most recognisable retail formats in the country.
A separate United States dry pint of 551 millilitres exists for produce, and nothing in the word distinguishes it. A pint of cream and a pint of blueberries are therefore different quantities, differing by about sixteen per cent, which is the sort of detail that only becomes visible when someone tries to convert a recipe.
One United States liquid pint equals 473.176 millilitres, 16 US fluid ounces, 0.125 US gallons, or about 0.833 imperial pints.