| Yobibits (Yibit) | Yobioctets (Yio) |
|---|---|
| 1 Yobibit | 0.125 Yio |
| 2 Yobibits | 0.25 Yio |
| 3 Yobibits | 0.375 Yio |
| 4 Yobibits | 0.5 Yio |
| 5 Yobibits | 0.625 Yio |
| 10 Yobibits | 1.25 Yio |
| 20 Yobibits | 2.5 Yio |
| 25 Yobibits | 3.125 Yio |
| 50 Yobibits | 6.25 Yio |
| 100 Yobibits | 12.5 Yio |
| Reference | Yobibits (Yibit) | Yobioctets (Yio) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.05879 × 10-21 Yibit | 1.32349 × 10-22 Yio |
| A three-minute MP3 | 1.98523 × 10-17 Yibit | 2.48154 × 10-18 Yio |
| A smartphone photo | 2.64698 × 10-17 Yibit | 3.30872 × 10-18 Yio |
| A high-definition film | 2.64698 × 10-14 Yibit | 3.30872 × 10-15 Yio |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 3.30872 × 10-13 Yibit | 4.1359 × 10-14 Yio |
The yobibit is a unit of digital information equal to two to the eightieth power bits, which is 1,024 zebibits. Its symbol is Yibit. It is the largest of the binary prefixes defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission, and the binary counterpart of the yottabit.
At this step the two conventions differ by 20.9 per cent. That gap is the culmination of the argument for the binary prefixes: a naming habit that was 2.4 per cent wrong at the kibibit is now a fifth wrong, which no engineering document can tolerate. The IEC series stops here because the decimal series stopped at yotta when it was defined in 1998.
When the metric system gained ronna and quetta in 2022, the binary series was not extended to match. There are no accepted names above yobi, so a quantity of two to the ninetieth bits has no short form and must be written out. This is a gap in the system that will presumably be filled when someone needs it, though at present nothing comes close.
A yobibit is 151,115,727,451,828,646,838,272 octets, or 128 zebioctets. The world's entire stock of data is somewhere in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, which is a fraction of a per cent of a yobioctet. Nothing at this scale has been built, is being built, or is presently planned.
The unit is nevertheless properly defined, and that completeness has a purpose. A measurement system whose rules run out at a certain size forces every future user to invent an extension, and competing extensions are how ambiguity begins. Defining the whole ladder in advance costs nothing and prevents that.
For anyone reading technical documents, the practical lesson of the whole binary series is the lowercase i. Kibit, Mibit, Gibit, Tibit, Pibit, Eibit, Zibit and Yibit are binary; kbit, Mbit, Gbit, Tbit, Pbit, Ebit, Zbit and Ybit are decimal; and the difference between them grows from negligible to a fifth as you climb. A writer who omits the i has left the reader to guess.
One yobibit equals 1,024 zebibits, 151,115,727,451,828,646,838,272 octets, or about 1.209 yottabits.
The yobioctet is a unit of digital information equal to two to the eightieth power octets, which is 1,024 zebioctets. Its symbol is Yio. It is the largest binary unit the International Electrotechnical Commission has named, and the binary counterpart of the yottaoctet.
At this final step the binary and decimal conventions differ by 20.9 per cent. That is the end of the argument the IEC prefixes were created to settle: a difference that began as a harmless 2.4 per cent at the kibioctet has grown, by eight successive multiplications of 1.024, into a discrepancy of more than a fifth. No system of measurement can carry an ambiguity that large.
A yobioctet is 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 octets. The entire quantity of data held by humanity is a few hundred zettaoctets, which is a fraction of a per cent of this. Nothing of this size has been built, and current manufacturing rates would need to continue for many centuries to accumulate one.
The binary series stops at yobi because the decimal series stopped at yotta when the IEC standard was written in 1998. When ronna and quetta were added to the metric system in 2022, no matching binary names were defined, so a quantity of two to the ninetieth octets has no accepted short form. That gap will presumably be filled if it is ever needed.
The value of defining the top of a ladder nobody has climbed is the same as the value of defining the bottom. A measurement system whose names run out forces its users to improvise, and improvised extensions conflict. Both the metric and the IEC series were written out in full so that the rule, rather than a table of exceptions, is all anyone has to learn.
For any reader of technical material, the lesson of the whole series is one character. Kio, Mio, Gio, Tio, Pio, Eio, Zio and Yio are binary; ko, Mo, Go, To, Po, Eo, Zo and Yo are decimal; and the difference between them widens from a rounding error to a fifth as you climb. That lowercase i is the only thing in a document that says which was meant.
One yobioctet equals 1,024 zebioctets, 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 octets, 8 yobibits, or about 1.209 yottaoctets.