| Yobibits (Yibit) | Zebioctets (Zio) |
|---|---|
| 1 Yobibit | 128 Zio |
| 2 Yobibits | 256 Zio |
| 3 Yobibits | 384 Zio |
| 4 Yobibits | 512 Zio |
| 5 Yobibits | 640 Zio |
| 10 Yobibits | 1280 Zio |
| 20 Yobibits | 2560 Zio |
| 25 Yobibits | 3200 Zio |
| 50 Yobibits | 6400 Zio |
| 100 Yobibits | 12800 Zio |
| Reference | Yobibits (Yibit) | Zebioctets (Zio) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.05879 × 10-21 Yibit | 1.35525 × 10-19 Zio |
| A three-minute MP3 | 1.98523 × 10-17 Yibit | 2.5411 × 10-15 Zio |
| A smartphone photo | 2.64698 × 10-17 Yibit | 3.38813 × 10-15 Zio |
| A high-definition film | 2.64698 × 10-14 Yibit | 3.38813 × 10-12 Zio |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 3.30872 × 10-13 Yibit | 4.23516 × 10-11 Zio |
The yobibit is a unit of digital information equal to two to the eightieth power bits, which is 1,024 zebibits. Its symbol is Yibit. It is the largest of the binary prefixes defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission, and the binary counterpart of the yottabit.
At this step the two conventions differ by 20.9 per cent. That gap is the culmination of the argument for the binary prefixes: a naming habit that was 2.4 per cent wrong at the kibibit is now a fifth wrong, which no engineering document can tolerate. The IEC series stops here because the decimal series stopped at yotta when it was defined in 1998.
When the metric system gained ronna and quetta in 2022, the binary series was not extended to match. There are no accepted names above yobi, so a quantity of two to the ninetieth bits has no short form and must be written out. This is a gap in the system that will presumably be filled when someone needs it, though at present nothing comes close.
A yobibit is 151,115,727,451,828,646,838,272 octets, or 128 zebioctets. The world's entire stock of data is somewhere in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, which is a fraction of a per cent of a yobioctet. Nothing at this scale has been built, is being built, or is presently planned.
The unit is nevertheless properly defined, and that completeness has a purpose. A measurement system whose rules run out at a certain size forces every future user to invent an extension, and competing extensions are how ambiguity begins. Defining the whole ladder in advance costs nothing and prevents that.
For anyone reading technical documents, the practical lesson of the whole binary series is the lowercase i. Kibit, Mibit, Gibit, Tibit, Pibit, Eibit, Zibit and Yibit are binary; kbit, Mbit, Gbit, Tbit, Pbit, Ebit, Zbit and Ybit are decimal; and the difference between them grows from negligible to a fifth as you climb. A writer who omits the i has left the reader to guess.
One yobibit equals 1,024 zebibits, 151,115,727,451,828,646,838,272 octets, or about 1.209 yottabits.
The zebioctet is a unit of digital information equal to two to the seventieth power octets, which is 1,024 exbioctets. Its symbol is Zio. It is the binary counterpart of the zettaoctet, and the two differ by 18.1 per cent.
Nothing of this size exists. The total quantity of data held by humanity, counting every copy and every backup, is estimated in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, and a zebioctet is 1.18 zettaoctets, so the world holds a few hundred of these units in total. It is the first binary unit for which the world's entire stock is a small multiple rather than a large one.
The unit is defined for completeness rather than for use, which is a deliberate feature of both the metric and the IEC systems. Every prefix applies to every unit without exception, so a reader who has never seen Zio can decode it from the prefix alone. A system that ran out of names at some arbitrary point would force each future user to invent an extension, and rival extensions are how ambiguity is born.
There is one place where the unit would arise naturally. Storage addressing beyond 64 bits has been designed but not needed: the ZFS filesystem uses 128-bit block pointers, giving it a theoretical capacity far beyond any binary prefix that has a name. Where such a scheme states intermediate limits, those limits fall in this range and are properly written in zebioctets.
The 18.1 per cent gap between zebioctet and zettaoctet is worth holding in mind when reading forecasts. Predictions of global data growth are published in zettaoctets, and any that were computed in binary and reported in decimal are nearly a fifth off. Given that such forecasts are already rough, that error is not the largest source of uncertainty, but it is an avoidable one.
The symbol Zio, like all the IEC symbols, is a capital letter followed by lowercase i and then the unit. It is the presence of that i, rather than any statement in the text, that tells a reader unambiguously which quantity is meant, and a document that omits it has not said what it appears to have said.
One zebioctet equals 1,024 exbioctets, 1,180,591,620,717,411,303,424 octets, 8 zebibits, or about 1.181 zettaoctets.