| Yobioctets (Yio) | Zebibits (Zibit) |
|---|---|
| 1 Yobioctet | 8192 Zibit |
| 2 Yobioctets | 16384 Zibit |
| 3 Yobioctets | 24576 Zibit |
| 4 Yobioctets | 32768 Zibit |
| 5 Yobioctets | 40960 Zibit |
| 10 Yobioctets | 81920 Zibit |
| 20 Yobioctets | 163840 Zibit |
| 25 Yobioctets | 204800 Zibit |
| 50 Yobioctets | 409600 Zibit |
| 100 Yobioctets | 819200 Zibit |
| Reference | Yobioctets (Yio) | Zebibits (Zibit) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.32349 × 10-22 Yio | 1.0842 × 10-18 Zibit |
| A three-minute MP3 | 2.48154 × 10-18 Yio | 2.03288 × 10-14 Zibit |
| A smartphone photo | 3.30872 × 10-18 Yio | 2.71051 × 10-14 Zibit |
| A high-definition film | 3.30872 × 10-15 Yio | 2.71051 × 10-11 Zibit |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 4.1359 × 10-14 Yio | 3.38813 × 10-10 Zibit |
The yobioctet is a unit of digital information equal to two to the eightieth power octets, which is 1,024 zebioctets. Its symbol is Yio. It is the largest binary unit the International Electrotechnical Commission has named, and the binary counterpart of the yottaoctet.
At this final step the binary and decimal conventions differ by 20.9 per cent. That is the end of the argument the IEC prefixes were created to settle: a difference that began as a harmless 2.4 per cent at the kibioctet has grown, by eight successive multiplications of 1.024, into a discrepancy of more than a fifth. No system of measurement can carry an ambiguity that large.
A yobioctet is 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 octets. The entire quantity of data held by humanity is a few hundred zettaoctets, which is a fraction of a per cent of this. Nothing of this size has been built, and current manufacturing rates would need to continue for many centuries to accumulate one.
The binary series stops at yobi because the decimal series stopped at yotta when the IEC standard was written in 1998. When ronna and quetta were added to the metric system in 2022, no matching binary names were defined, so a quantity of two to the ninetieth octets has no accepted short form. That gap will presumably be filled if it is ever needed.
The value of defining the top of a ladder nobody has climbed is the same as the value of defining the bottom. A measurement system whose names run out forces its users to improvise, and improvised extensions conflict. Both the metric and the IEC series were written out in full so that the rule, rather than a table of exceptions, is all anyone has to learn.
For any reader of technical material, the lesson of the whole series is one character. Kio, Mio, Gio, Tio, Pio, Eio, Zio and Yio are binary; ko, Mo, Go, To, Po, Eo, Zo and Yo are decimal; and the difference between them widens from a rounding error to a fifth as you climb. That lowercase i is the only thing in a document that says which was meant.
One yobioctet equals 1,024 zebioctets, 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 octets, 8 yobibits, or about 1.209 yottaoctets.
The zebibit is a unit of digital information equal to two to the seventieth power bits, which is 1,024 exbibits. Its symbol is Zibit. It is the binary counterpart of the zettabit, and the two now differ by 18.1 per cent — nearly a fifth.
That divergence is the reason the binary prefixes were needed at all. At the kibibit the two conventions differed by 2.4 per cent, a rounding error. Here the difference is large enough that a document using the wrong one is simply reporting a different quantity, and no amount of context can repair the ambiguity after the fact.
A zebibit is 147,573,952,589,676,412,928 octets, or 128 exbioctets. Nothing of this size exists. The total data held by humanity is somewhere in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, which is under a zebioctet, so the world's entire information stock does not yet reach one unit at this step of the binary ladder.
The unit exists because the IEC series was defined completely rather than as far as anyone then needed. That is the same principle the metric system follows: every prefix applies to every unit, whether or not the combination has yet been used. A system with holes in it requires a table of exceptions, and a system without holes requires only the rule.
Where the zebibit could genuinely appear is in address space arithmetic. Two to the seventieth is not a natural pointer width, but multiples and fractions of powers of two run through every discussion of addressing, and a scheme that reserved seventy bits for something would naturally be described in these terms. Such schemes are proposed occasionally and none has yet been needed.
Reading the symbol is the practical skill. Zibit is binary, Zbit is decimal, and at eighteen per cent apart the two are not interchangeable in any document where the number matters. Where a source writes ZB with no explanation, there is no way to know which was meant, and the honest response is to treat the figure as uncertain to a fifth.
One zebibit equals 1,024 exbibits, 147,573,952,589,676,412,928 octets, or about 1.181 zettabits.