| US Dry pints (pt) | Fluid ounces (fl oz) |
|---|---|
| 1 US Dry pint | 19.3787794258 fl oz |
| 2 US Dry pints | 38.7575588517 fl oz |
| 3 US Dry pints | 58.1363382775 fl oz |
| 4 US Dry pints | 77.5151177033 fl oz |
| 5 US Dry pints | 96.8938971292 fl oz |
| 10 US Dry pints | 193.787794258 fl oz |
| 20 US Dry pints | 387.575588517 fl oz |
| 25 US Dry pints | 484.469485646 fl oz |
| 50 US Dry pints | 968.938971292 fl oz |
| 100 US Dry pints | 1937.87794258 fl oz |
| Reference | US Dry pints (pt) | Fluid ounces (fl oz) |
|---|---|---|
| A teaspoon | 0.00908083 pt | 0.175975 fl oz |
| A can of soft drink | 0.599335 pt | 11.6144 fl oz |
| A wine bottle | 1.36212 pt | 26.3963 fl oz |
| A bathtub | 272.425 pt | 5279.26 fl oz |
| An Olympic swimming pool | 4540415 pt | 87987699 fl oz |
The United States dry pint is a unit of volume equal to 550.610471 millilitres, or 33.6 cubic inches. Its symbol is pt. It belongs to a separate American measuring system used for produce and grain rather than for liquids, and it is about sixteen per cent larger than the United States liquid pint of 473 millilitres.
Two parallel chains exist because two kinds of goods were once measured differently. Liquids descend from the wine gallon of 231 cubic inches, while dry goods descend from the Winchester bushel of 2150.42 cubic inches, a corn measure standardised in medieval England. Dividing the bushel by four gives a peck, by thirty-two a dry quart, and by sixty-four a dry pint, and none of those figures has any relation to the liquid chain.
Berries are where the unit is still met. Blueberries, raspberries and strawberries are sold in American markets in pint and quart baskets, and the basket is a dry measure. A pint of blueberries is therefore 551 millilitres of fruit, not 473, and a shopper comparing that basket with a pint of cream is comparing two different quantities under one name.
Nothing on a label resolves the ambiguity. Both are written pt, both are called a pint, and the word gives no clue as to which chain is meant. In practice the contents decide: if it pours, it is liquid measure, and if it is heaped, it is dry. That rule is reliable but it is nowhere written down, which is why converted American recipes so often disagree with one another.
Its existence is a survival from selling by bulk. Before cheap accurate scales, grain, apples, potatoes and shellfish were sold by filling a stamped measure and levelling it off, and the whole dry chain from bushel down to pint served that trade. Almost all of it has now been replaced by weight, and United States produce regulations increasingly specify pounds instead.
For conversion, the safest approach is to abandon the name entirely. A dry pint is 551 millilitres, a dry quart 1101, a peck 8.81 litres and a bushel 35.24. Writing the metric figure removes an ambiguity that the English word carries and cannot shed.
One United States dry pint equals 550.61 millilitres, 33.6 cubic inches, half a US dry quart, or about 1.164 US liquid pints.
The fluid ounce in the imperial system is a unit of volume equal to exactly 28.4130625 millilitres. Its symbol is fl oz. Twenty of them make an imperial pint and 160 an imperial gallon. It is the smallest unit of the imperial liquid chain in ordinary use, and its name records exactly what it was built to do.
The name is literal. The Weights and Measures Act of 1824 defined the fluid ounce as the volume occupied by one avoirdupois ounce of water, so a fluid ounce of water weighs an ounce. The modern definition is metric and the agreement is no longer exact, but it is close: a fluid ounce of water weighs 28.4 grams against the ounce's 28.35, a difference of two parts in a thousand.
The United States fluid ounce is a different quantity, and the relationship between the two is the most confusing pair of units in either system. A United States fluid ounce is 29.5735 millilitres, so it is four per cent larger than the imperial one. Yet a United States pint contains only sixteen of them where an imperial pint contains twenty, so the American pint ends up seventeen per cent smaller. The smaller unit belongs to the larger system and the larger unit to the smaller.
That reversal has practical consequences. A recipe calling for eight fluid ounces of milk means 237 millilitres in America and 227 in Britain, which is tolerable, but one calling for a pint means 473 or 568, which is not. Cosmetics, medicines and drinks all carry both figures on internationally sold packaging for exactly this reason.
British labelling now leads with millilitres. Toiletries, spirits and soft drinks are specified in metric units, with fluid ounces printed alongside for markets that expect them, and pharmacy long ago abandoned the fluid ounce and the fluid dram in favour of millilitres. What survives is culinary and conversational rather than legal.
Where an old British recipe uses it, the conversion is straightforward as long as the system is known: multiply by 28.4 for millilitres, and remember that the pint above it holds twenty and not sixteen. Getting the pint right matters more than getting the ounce right, because the error compounds with quantity.
One imperial fluid ounce equals 28.4130625 millilitres, 1/20 of an imperial pint, or about 0.961 US fluid ounces.