| Teraoctets (To) | Kibibits (Kibit) |
|---|---|
| 1 Teraoctet | 7812500000 Kibit |
| 2 Teraoctets | 15625000000 Kibit |
| 3 Teraoctets | 23437500000 Kibit |
| 4 Teraoctets | 31250000000 Kibit |
| 5 Teraoctets | 39062500000 Kibit |
| 10 Teraoctets | 78125000000 Kibit |
| 20 Teraoctets | 156250000000 Kibit |
| 25 Teraoctets | 195312500000 Kibit |
| 50 Teraoctets | 390625000000 Kibit |
| 100 Teraoctets | 781250000000 Kibit |
| Reference | Teraoctets (To) | Kibibits (Kibit) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.6 × 10-10 To | 1.25 Kibit |
| A three-minute MP3 | 0.000003 To | 23437.5 Kibit |
| A smartphone photo | 0.000004 To | 31250 Kibit |
| A high-definition film | 0.004 To | 31250000 Kibit |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 0.05 To | 390625000 Kibit |
The teraoctet is a unit of digital information equal to one million million octets, or a thousand gigaoctets. Its symbol is To. It is the unit of the modern hard drive, and the point at which personal storage stopped being something anyone needed to manage carefully.
A teraoctet holds roughly two hundred and fifty thousand photographs from a phone, or two hundred hours of high-definition video, or a quarter of a million songs. For a person who is not a professional photographer or video editor, a single teraoctet is more storage than a lifetime of ordinary files will fill.
Consumer hard drives crossed one teraoctet in 2007 and now reach twenty or more. Solid-state drives arrived at the same capacities more slowly and at higher cost, but with far greater speed, and the two technologies now divide the market between capacity and performance rather than competing directly.
The teraoctet is where the decimal-binary discrepancy becomes visible enough to annoy. A drive sold as one teraoctet holds a million million octets exactly; the operating system divides by 1,024 four times and reports 0.909 tebioctets, which it usually labels as 931 gigaoctets. The shortfall appears to be 7 per cent, though nothing has actually been lost. At the petaoctet the same arithmetic produces a 12 per cent gap.
Backup and archiving live at this scale. A household's complete collection of photographs, documents and video typically fits in a few teraoctets, which is why external drives are sold in exactly that range. Cloud storage services price in teraoctets too, and the economics of keeping a second copy of everything only work because the unit price of storage has fallen faster than the quantity has grown.
In professional work the teraoctet is a daily quantity rather than a milestone. A day of filming in high resolution produces several teraoctets of raw footage. A genome sequencing run produces a few hundred gigaoctets, so a modest laboratory generates teraoctets a week. Both fields have had to build workflows around moving data that will not fit on any network in reasonable time.
One teraoctet equals 1,000,000,000,000 octets, 1,000 gigaoctets, 8 terabits, or about 0.9095 tebioctets.
The kibibit is a unit of digital information equal to 1,024 bits. Its symbol is Kibit. It is the first of the binary prefixes, a set of units defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission in 1998 to end a confusion that had run through computing since the 1960s.
The problem was straightforward. Computers address memory in powers of two, so memory came in chunks of 1,024 rather than 1,000. Engineers borrowed the metric prefix kilo for that quantity because 1,024 is close to 1,000, and for small numbers the approximation was harmless. But storage and transmission counted in true thousands, so the same prefix meant two different things depending on which part of the machine was being described.
The IEC's solution was to coin new names. Kibi is a contraction of kilo binary, and the pattern continues with mebi, gibi, tebi, pebi, exbi, zebi and yobi. Each is 1,024 times the one below, and each symbol takes the form of a capital letter followed by a lowercase i: Ki, Mi, Gi, Ti and so on. The kilobit then means one thousand bits and nothing else.
A kibibit is 128 octets, and the gap from a kilobit is 2.4 per cent. That small difference is why the two were confused for so long: at this scale nobody notices. The error compounds by 2.4 per cent at every step, reaching 5 per cent at the mebibit, 7 per cent at the gibibit and 21 per cent by the yobibit, which is where the ambiguity became genuinely expensive.
Adoption has been partial and uneven. Standards bodies, the Linux kernel and most technical documentation use the IEC prefixes correctly. Consumer software largely does not, and many programs still write KB while dividing by 1,024. The result is that a reader must often infer from context which convention a number follows, which is exactly what the standard was written to prevent.
In practice the kibibit itself appears mainly in the specifications of small memory chips, in serial memory used by embedded systems, and in protocol documents where an exact power of two matters. Anywhere the number 1,024 is meant rather than 1,000, this is the correct unit.
One kibibit equals 1,024 bits, 128 octets, or 1.024 kilobits.