| Tebibits (Tibit) | Kibibits (Kibit) |
|---|---|
| 1 Tebibit | 1073741824 Kibit |
| 2 Tebibits | 2147483648 Kibit |
| 3 Tebibits | 3221225472 Kibit |
| 4 Tebibits | 4294967296 Kibit |
| 5 Tebibits | 5368709120 Kibit |
| 10 Tebibits | 10737418240 Kibit |
| 20 Tebibits | 21474836480 Kibit |
| 25 Tebibits | 26843545600 Kibit |
| 50 Tebibits | 53687091200 Kibit |
| 100 Tebibits | 107374182400 Kibit |
| Reference | Tebibits (Tibit) | Kibibits (Kibit) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 0.00000000116415 Tibit | 1.25 Kibit |
| A three-minute MP3 | 0.0000218279 Tibit | 23437.5 Kibit |
| A smartphone photo | 0.0000291038 Tibit | 31250 Kibit |
| A high-definition film | 0.0291038 Tibit | 31250000 Kibit |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 0.363798 Tibit | 390625000 Kibit |
The tebibit is a unit of digital information equal to 1,099,511,627,776 bits, which is 1,024 gibibits or two to the fortieth power. Its symbol is Tibit. It is the binary counterpart of the terabit, and the two now differ by 10 per cent, the point at which the distinction stops being pedantic and starts being financial.
That ten per cent is the reason the IEC prefixes exist. At the kibibit the discrepancy was 2.4 per cent and could be waved away; here it is a tenth of the quantity. In a contract for storage hardware, in a service agreement that guarantees capacity, or in a specification that a supplier must meet, a tenth is the difference between compliance and breach.
The unit's real home is flash memory, where dies are now made with capacities of one tebibit and above by stacking cell layers vertically. A modern flash die may hold a tebibit or two, and a package containing eight of them holds a teraoctet of raw capacity, from which spare blocks and management overhead are subtracted before anything reaches the user.
A tebibit is 137,438,953,472 octets, or 128 gibioctets. In practical terms it is the storage of a mid-range phone, or a couple of hours of uncompressed high-resolution video. The unit describes the raw material of storage devices rather than anything a person handles directly.
Filesystems also count in binary at this scale. A volume reported as 16 tebibytes by one tool and 17.6 terabytes by another is the same volume, and the difference is entirely in the base of the arithmetic. Anyone administering storage learns to check which convention a tool uses before comparing two numbers from different sources.
Correct notation is Tibit, with the capital T and lowercase i. It appears in flash memory datasheets, in filesystem documentation and in standards, and almost nowhere else. The presence of that lowercase i is the only reliable signal that a figure is binary, which is why careful technical writing uses it even when the difference seems small.
One tebibit equals 1,099,511,627,776 bits, 1,024 gibibits, 137,438,953,472 octets, or about 1.100 terabits.
The kibibit is a unit of digital information equal to 1,024 bits. Its symbol is Kibit. It is the first of the binary prefixes, a set of units defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission in 1998 to end a confusion that had run through computing since the 1960s.
The problem was straightforward. Computers address memory in powers of two, so memory came in chunks of 1,024 rather than 1,000. Engineers borrowed the metric prefix kilo for that quantity because 1,024 is close to 1,000, and for small numbers the approximation was harmless. But storage and transmission counted in true thousands, so the same prefix meant two different things depending on which part of the machine was being described.
The IEC's solution was to coin new names. Kibi is a contraction of kilo binary, and the pattern continues with mebi, gibi, tebi, pebi, exbi, zebi and yobi. Each is 1,024 times the one below, and each symbol takes the form of a capital letter followed by a lowercase i: Ki, Mi, Gi, Ti and so on. The kilobit then means one thousand bits and nothing else.
A kibibit is 128 octets, and the gap from a kilobit is 2.4 per cent. That small difference is why the two were confused for so long: at this scale nobody notices. The error compounds by 2.4 per cent at every step, reaching 5 per cent at the mebibit, 7 per cent at the gibibit and 21 per cent by the yobibit, which is where the ambiguity became genuinely expensive.
Adoption has been partial and uneven. Standards bodies, the Linux kernel and most technical documentation use the IEC prefixes correctly. Consumer software largely does not, and many programs still write KB while dividing by 1,024. The result is that a reader must often infer from context which convention a number follows, which is exactly what the standard was written to prevent.
In practice the kibibit itself appears mainly in the specifications of small memory chips, in serial memory used by embedded systems, and in protocol documents where an exact power of two matters. Anywhere the number 1,024 is meant rather than 1,000, this is the correct unit.
One kibibit equals 1,024 bits, 128 octets, or 1.024 kilobits.