| Petabits (Pbit) | Kibibits (Kibit) |
|---|---|
| 1 Petabit | 976562500000 Kibit |
| 2 Petabits | 1953125000000 Kibit |
| 3 Petabits | 2929687500000 Kibit |
| 4 Petabits | 3906250000000 Kibit |
| 5 Petabits | 4882812500000 Kibit |
| 10 Petabits | 9765625000000 Kibit |
| 20 Petabits | 19531250000000 Kibit |
| 25 Petabits | 24414062500000 Kibit |
| 50 Petabits | 48828125000000 Kibit |
| 100 Petabits | 97656250000000 Kibit |
| Reference | Petabits (Pbit) | Kibibits (Kibit) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.28 × 10-12 Pbit | 1.25 Kibit |
| A three-minute MP3 | 0.000000024 Pbit | 23437.5 Kibit |
| A smartphone photo | 0.000000032 Pbit | 31250 Kibit |
| A high-definition film | 0.000032 Pbit | 31250000 Kibit |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 0.0004 Pbit | 390625000 Kibit |
The petabit is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand terabits, or a million billion bits. Its symbol is Pbit. It sits at the boundary between quantities that are routinely deployed and quantities that still belong to research laboratories and to totals aggregated across whole networks.
A petabit is 125 teraoctets. That is the storage of roughly a hundred and twenty-five large consumer hard drives, or in more everyday terms about thirty thousand hours of high-definition video — three and a half years of continuous viewing. No single device holds a petabit; the figure describes systems rather than objects.
The most striking use of the unit is in optical transmission records. Research groups in Japan, the Netherlands and elsewhere have carried more than a petabit per second down a single strand of fibre, achieved by combining multi-core fibre — several light-guiding paths inside one cladding — with hundreds of separate wavelengths and advanced modulation. Those results run over tens of kilometres in the laboratory, not the thousands of kilometres a working sea cable must cross.
At the network level the petabit describes aggregate capacity. The total interconnect capacity of a large data centre, the combined capacity of all cables landing on a continent, and the peak throughput of the largest content networks are all quoted in petabits per second. These are sums over many links rather than the rating of any one of them.
Storage systems reach petabit scale too, though they are always labelled in octets. A large scientific archive holding a hundred petaoctets is holding eight hundred petabits, and facilities of that size exist for genomics, particle physics and astronomical survey data. The particle detectors at CERN discard the vast majority of what they see precisely because keeping it would exceed even these capacities.
The prefix peta comes from the Greek for five, because a petabit is a thousand raised to the fifth power in bits. That naming pattern continues upward with exa for six and zetta for seven, so the ladder above the petabit is regular and easy to extend.
One petabit equals 1,000,000,000,000,000 bits, 1,000 terabits, 125 teraoctets, or about 0.8882 pebibits.
The kibibit is a unit of digital information equal to 1,024 bits. Its symbol is Kibit. It is the first of the binary prefixes, a set of units defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission in 1998 to end a confusion that had run through computing since the 1960s.
The problem was straightforward. Computers address memory in powers of two, so memory came in chunks of 1,024 rather than 1,000. Engineers borrowed the metric prefix kilo for that quantity because 1,024 is close to 1,000, and for small numbers the approximation was harmless. But storage and transmission counted in true thousands, so the same prefix meant two different things depending on which part of the machine was being described.
The IEC's solution was to coin new names. Kibi is a contraction of kilo binary, and the pattern continues with mebi, gibi, tebi, pebi, exbi, zebi and yobi. Each is 1,024 times the one below, and each symbol takes the form of a capital letter followed by a lowercase i: Ki, Mi, Gi, Ti and so on. The kilobit then means one thousand bits and nothing else.
A kibibit is 128 octets, and the gap from a kilobit is 2.4 per cent. That small difference is why the two were confused for so long: at this scale nobody notices. The error compounds by 2.4 per cent at every step, reaching 5 per cent at the mebibit, 7 per cent at the gibibit and 21 per cent by the yobibit, which is where the ambiguity became genuinely expensive.
Adoption has been partial and uneven. Standards bodies, the Linux kernel and most technical documentation use the IEC prefixes correctly. Consumer software largely does not, and many programs still write KB while dividing by 1,024. The result is that a reader must often infer from context which convention a number follows, which is exactly what the standard was written to prevent.
In practice the kibibit itself appears mainly in the specifications of small memory chips, in serial memory used by embedded systems, and in protocol documents where an exact power of two matters. Anywhere the number 1,024 is meant rather than 1,000, this is the correct unit.
One kibibit equals 1,024 bits, 128 octets, or 1.024 kilobits.