| Nanojoules (nJ) | Calories (cal) |
|---|---|
| 1 Nanojoule | 2.39005736138 × 10-10 cal |
| 2 Nanojoules | 4.78011472275 × 10-10 cal |
| 3 Nanojoules | 7.17017208413 × 10-10 cal |
| 4 Nanojoules | 9.56022944551 × 10-10 cal |
| 5 Nanojoules | 0.00000000119502868069 cal |
| 10 Nanojoules | 0.00000000239005736138 cal |
| 20 Nanojoules | 0.00000000478011472275 cal |
| 25 Nanojoules | 0.00000000597514340344 cal |
| 50 Nanojoules | 0.0000000119502868069 cal |
| 100 Nanojoules | 0.0000000239005736138 cal |
| Reference | Nanojoules (nJ) | Calories (cal) |
|---|---|---|
| One food calorie (kcal) | 4.184 × 1012 nJ | 1000 cal |
| An AA alkaline battery | 1 × 1013 nJ | 2390.06 cal |
| Daily adult food intake | 8.368 × 1015 nJ | 2000000 cal |
| One unit on an electricity bill | 3.6 × 1015 nJ | 860421 cal |
| A lightning strike | 1 × 1018 nJ | 239005736 cal |
The nanojoule is a unit of energy equal to one billionth of a joule, or 0.000000001 joules. Its symbol is nJ. It marks the point where mechanics gives way to optics and electronics: far too little to move anything the eye can see, yet still very large compared with the energy carried by a single particle. Almost every quantity written in nanojoules comes off an instrument rather than out of everyday experience.
Light gives the clearest picture of the scale. A photon of green light carries about 3.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ joules, so a nanojoule is roughly 2.8 billion such photons arriving together. Measured against heat it is larger still: the average thermal energy of a single molecule at room temperature is about 4 × 10⁻²¹ joules, which makes one nanojoule some 240 billion times that. The unit therefore sits well above the quantum world and well below the mechanical one.
Pulsed lasers are where it earns its keep. The oscillator in a two-photon microscope typically delivers pulses of a few nanojoules at eighty million pulses a second, which averages out to a few hundred milliwatts of beam power. Fibre lasers, optical coherence tomography scanners and time-of-flight rangefinders are all specified the same way, because what damages a sample or returns a usable echo is the energy in each pulse, not the average power spread across the second.
Digital electronics is measured against the nanojoule from below. A single switching event inside a processor costs femtojoules, a memory access a few picojoules, so one nanojoule pays for hundreds of memory reads or millions of logic operations. Energy-harvesting design inverts the picture: an indoor photovoltaic cell, a piezoelectric pickup or a radio-frequency antenna may gather only a few nanojoules per second, and the whole craft of ultra-low-power engineering consists of fitting useful work inside that budget.
Ordinary objects reach the scale only when they are very small or barely moved. A grain of sand weighing a milligram, falling a tenth of a millimetre, releases about one nanojoule. Lifting a single human hair by its own width costs less than that. Nothing in a kitchen or a workshop is ever priced in nanojoules, which is precisely why the unit belongs to laboratories, laser catalogues and datasheets rather than to bills and labels.
In writing, the prefix competes with scientific notation. Physics papers usually print 10⁻⁹ J and move on, while instrument manufacturers print nJ because it fits on a specification line and reads without arithmetic. Both express the same quantity, and the choice says more about the intended reader than about the measurement. Where a table mixes pulse energies spanning several decades, the prefixed forms are generally easier to compare at a glance.
One nanojoule equals 0.000000001 joules, about 6.24 × 10⁹ electronvolts, or about 2.78 × 10⁻¹³ watt-hours.
The calorie is a unit of energy equal to 4.184 joules. Its symbol is cal. It was originally defined as the heat needed to raise the temperature of one gram of water by one degree Celsius, and it is not an SI unit, though it survives almost everywhere that food and heat are discussed.
The original definition was awkward because the answer depends on the starting temperature. Water takes slightly more heat to warm from 14.5 to 15.5 degrees than from 19.5 to 20.5, so several competing calories existed: the fifteen-degree calorie, the mean calorie and the International Steam Table calorie among them. The thermochemical calorie now used is simply defined as exactly 4.184 joules, cutting the link to water entirely and ending the ambiguity.
The greater confusion is one of scale. The calorie printed on food packaging in the United States is not this unit at all but the kilocalorie, a thousand times larger, sometimes distinguished by a capital C. A biscuit described as containing sixty calories in fact contains sixty thousand of the unit described here. The convention is entrenched and unlikely to change, so nutritional figures and physical ones must be read in different registers.
Chemistry retained the calorie long after physics moved on. Enthalpies of reaction, bond energies and heats of formation were tabulated in kilocalories per mole for most of the twentieth century, and older literature and some current American textbooks still are. The equivalent SI figure in kilojoules per mole is larger by a factor of 4.184, and misreading which is meant produces errors that look plausible.
Nutrition science uses it because human energy balance happens to sit at a convenient scale in kilocalories, with a daily requirement of around two thousand. In joules the same figure is roughly eight and a half million, which is accurate but harder to reason with.
Air conditioning and refrigeration in some countries still rate capacity in kilocalories per hour, and heating values of fuels appear in calories per gram in older engineering tables.
One calorie equals exactly 4.184 joules, 0.001 kilocalories, or about 0.00116 watt-hours.