| Exaoctets (Eo) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|
| 1 Exaoctet | 0.000001 Yo |
| 2 Exaoctets | 0.000002 Yo |
| 3 Exaoctets | 0.000003 Yo |
| 4 Exaoctets | 0.000004 Yo |
| 5 Exaoctets | 0.000005 Yo |
| 10 Exaoctets | 0.00001 Yo |
| 20 Exaoctets | 0.00002 Yo |
| 25 Exaoctets | 0.000025 Yo |
| 50 Exaoctets | 0.00005 Yo |
| 100 Exaoctets | 0.0001 Yo |
| Reference | Exaoctets (Eo) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.6 × 10-16 Eo | 1.6 × 10-22 Yo |
| A three-minute MP3 | 3 × 10-12 Eo | 3 × 10-18 Yo |
| A smartphone photo | 4 × 10-12 Eo | 4 × 10-18 Yo |
| A high-definition film | 0.000000004 Eo | 4 × 10-15 Yo |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 0.00000005 Eo | 5 × 10-14 Yo |
The exaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand petaoctets, or a billion gigaoctets. Its symbol is Eo. It is the unit in which the world's data flows and stockpiles are counted, and it belongs to civilisations rather than to companies or machines.
The most quoted figure involving it is global internet traffic, which passed one exaoctet per month around 2004 and now runs to several hundred exaoctets monthly. Written as an annual total that is several thousand exaoctets, which is why the zettaoctet was pressed into service for yearly figures a decade ago.
A frequently repeated claim holds that all the words ever spoken by human beings would amount to about five exaoctets in text. The estimate comes from a 2003 study and is very rough, but it makes the point: five exaoctets is now less than a fortnight of internet traffic. Whatever the exact number, the flow of data through the network long ago overtook the total of everything humanity has ever said.
Storage at exaoctet scale exists only at the largest cloud providers, and even there it is spread across dozens of buildings on several continents. The annual production of all the world's hard drives and flash memory together is a few hundred exaoctets, so the exaoctet is also the natural unit for describing the output of an entire industry.
What is stored at this scale is mostly not what people imagine. Backups, replicas, logs, telemetry, machine learning training corpora and video kept for regulatory reasons dominate. Deliberately created human work — documents, photographs, recordings that someone chose to make and keep — is a small and shrinking fraction of the whole.
The prefix exa has been part of the metric system since 1975, adopted at the same conference as peta. At the time these were prefixes without applications, defined for completeness. The fact that both became working units of a commercial industry within thirty years is the clearest single measure of how quickly digital information grew.
One exaoctet equals 1,000 petaoctets, 1,000,000,000 gigaoctets, 8 exabits, or about 0.8674 exbioctets.
The yottaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand zettaoctets, or a septillion octets — a one followed by twenty-four zeros. Its symbol is Yo. Nothing that exists is measured in yottaoctets; the unit describes a quantity of data the world has not yet produced.
The total data held by humanity is currently estimated in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, so the world is a small fraction of the way to its first yottaoctet. On the growth rates of the last two decades, that threshold would be crossed sometime in the 2040s, though every long-range forecast in this field has been wrong in both directions.
The physical obstacles are severe. At the storage densities of current hard drives, a yottaoctet would need something like a hundred billion units. Manufacturing them at present rates would take centuries, powering them would need the electrical output of many countries, and housing them would require a building programme without precedent. The number is not absurd, but it is far beyond the current industrial base.
Research into higher-density storage exists partly because of this ceiling. DNA data storage, which encodes information in synthetic genetic sequences, offers densities millions of times higher than magnetic media, and a yottaoctet of DNA would fit in a room rather than a continent. Reading and writing it remain slow and costly, but the density argument is what keeps the field funded.
The yottaoctet also appears in claims that turn out to be exaggerated. Reports that intelligence agencies were building yottaoctet-scale facilities circulated widely in the 2010s and were not supported by the construction, the power supply or the storage market. Any claim about a yottaoctet of anything can be checked against total world manufacturing, which is a useful discipline.
Between 1991 and 2022 the yotta prefix was the top of the metric ladder, which is why it was the natural unit for speculative claims. The addition of ronna and quetta in 2022 gave the system three more decimal orders above it, and it is telling that this was done partly because data quantities were approaching the old ceiling.
One yottaoctet equals 1,000 zettaoctets, 1,000,000,000,000,000 gigaoctets, 8 yottabits, or about 0.8272 yobioctets.