| Cubic millimeters (mm³) | US Dry pints (pt) |
|---|---|
| 1 Cubic millimeter | 0.00000181616596972 pt |
| 2 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000363233193943 pt |
| 3 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000544849790915 pt |
| 4 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000726466387887 pt |
| 5 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000908082984858 pt |
| 10 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000181616596972 pt |
| 20 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000363233193943 pt |
| 25 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000454041492429 pt |
| 50 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000908082984858 pt |
| 100 Cubic millimeters | 0.000181616596972 pt |
| Reference | Cubic millimeters (mm³) | US Dry pints (pt) |
|---|---|---|
| A teaspoon | 5000 mm³ | 0.00908083 pt |
| A can of soft drink | 330000 mm³ | 0.599335 pt |
| A wine bottle | 750000 mm³ | 1.36212 pt |
| A bathtub | 150000000 mm³ | 272.425 pt |
| An Olympic swimming pool | 2.5 × 1012 mm³ | 4540415 pt |
The cubic millimetre is a unit of volume equal to one thousandth of a cubic centimetre, written mm³. It is the volume of a cube one millimetre on each side, and it is exactly one microlitre. Which of the two names is used depends on whether the thing being measured is a solid or a liquid, and the distinction is entirely a matter of professional habit.
Machining measures productivity in it. The material removal rate of a milling cutter or a grinding wheel is quoted in cubic millimetres per minute, and that single figure captures what a machine and a tool can achieve better than spindle speed or feed rate can on their own. Comparing two cutting strategies, two tool coatings or two machines means comparing how many cubic millimetres of metal each turns into swarf per unit time.
Additive manufacturing inverts the same measurement. A fused-filament printer deposits ten to twenty cubic millimetres a second, a laser powder-bed machine rather less, and build time follows directly from the part volume divided by that rate. Because the volume of a component is known exactly from its model, the estimate is unusually reliable.
Wear and durability testing uses the unit to describe loss. A specific wear rate is stated in cubic millimetres removed per newton of load and metre of sliding, which allows materials of very different hardness to be compared on one scale. Bearing life, brake pad testing and coating evaluation all reduce to counting cubic millimetres that are no longer there.
Medical imaging works at the same magnitude. Micro-computed tomography of bone reports trabecular volume and porosity in cubic millimetres, tumour volumes in early imaging are given the same way, and voxel sizes in high-resolution scans are quoted as fractions of one. In each case the unit is small enough to describe structure rather than merely size.
Its identity with the microlitre is worth remembering when moving between fields. An engineer discussing a cubic millimetre of material and a biologist discussing a microlitre of solution are talking about the same quantity, and any calculation that mixes the two needs no conversion factor at all.
One cubic millimetre equals 1 microlitre, 0.001 cubic centimetres, 0.000000001 cubic metres, or about 0.000061 cubic inches.
The United States dry pint is a unit of volume equal to 550.610471 millilitres, or 33.6 cubic inches. Its symbol is pt. It belongs to a separate American measuring system used for produce and grain rather than for liquids, and it is about sixteen per cent larger than the United States liquid pint of 473 millilitres.
Two parallel chains exist because two kinds of goods were once measured differently. Liquids descend from the wine gallon of 231 cubic inches, while dry goods descend from the Winchester bushel of 2150.42 cubic inches, a corn measure standardised in medieval England. Dividing the bushel by four gives a peck, by thirty-two a dry quart, and by sixty-four a dry pint, and none of those figures has any relation to the liquid chain.
Berries are where the unit is still met. Blueberries, raspberries and strawberries are sold in American markets in pint and quart baskets, and the basket is a dry measure. A pint of blueberries is therefore 551 millilitres of fruit, not 473, and a shopper comparing that basket with a pint of cream is comparing two different quantities under one name.
Nothing on a label resolves the ambiguity. Both are written pt, both are called a pint, and the word gives no clue as to which chain is meant. In practice the contents decide: if it pours, it is liquid measure, and if it is heaped, it is dry. That rule is reliable but it is nowhere written down, which is why converted American recipes so often disagree with one another.
Its existence is a survival from selling by bulk. Before cheap accurate scales, grain, apples, potatoes and shellfish were sold by filling a stamped measure and levelling it off, and the whole dry chain from bushel down to pint served that trade. Almost all of it has now been replaced by weight, and United States produce regulations increasingly specify pounds instead.
For conversion, the safest approach is to abandon the name entirely. A dry pint is 551 millilitres, a dry quart 1101, a peck 8.81 litres and a bushel 35.24. Writing the metric figure removes an ambiguity that the English word carries and cannot shed.
One United States dry pint equals 550.61 millilitres, 33.6 cubic inches, half a US dry quart, or about 1.164 US liquid pints.