| Cubic millimeters (mm³) | Quarts (qt) |
|---|---|
| 1 Cubic millimeter | 0.000000879876993196 qt |
| 2 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000175975398639 qt |
| 3 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000263963097959 qt |
| 4 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000351950797279 qt |
| 5 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000439938496598 qt |
| 10 Cubic millimeters | 0.00000879876993196 qt |
| 20 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000175975398639 qt |
| 25 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000219969248299 qt |
| 50 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000439938496598 qt |
| 100 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000879876993196 qt |
| Reference | Cubic millimeters (mm³) | Quarts (qt) |
|---|---|---|
| A teaspoon | 5000 mm³ | 0.00439938 qt |
| A can of soft drink | 330000 mm³ | 0.290359 qt |
| A wine bottle | 750000 mm³ | 0.659908 qt |
| A bathtub | 150000000 mm³ | 131.982 qt |
| An Olympic swimming pool | 2.5 × 1012 mm³ | 2199692 qt |
The cubic millimetre is a unit of volume equal to one thousandth of a cubic centimetre, written mm³. It is the volume of a cube one millimetre on each side, and it is exactly one microlitre. Which of the two names is used depends on whether the thing being measured is a solid or a liquid, and the distinction is entirely a matter of professional habit.
Machining measures productivity in it. The material removal rate of a milling cutter or a grinding wheel is quoted in cubic millimetres per minute, and that single figure captures what a machine and a tool can achieve better than spindle speed or feed rate can on their own. Comparing two cutting strategies, two tool coatings or two machines means comparing how many cubic millimetres of metal each turns into swarf per unit time.
Additive manufacturing inverts the same measurement. A fused-filament printer deposits ten to twenty cubic millimetres a second, a laser powder-bed machine rather less, and build time follows directly from the part volume divided by that rate. Because the volume of a component is known exactly from its model, the estimate is unusually reliable.
Wear and durability testing uses the unit to describe loss. A specific wear rate is stated in cubic millimetres removed per newton of load and metre of sliding, which allows materials of very different hardness to be compared on one scale. Bearing life, brake pad testing and coating evaluation all reduce to counting cubic millimetres that are no longer there.
Medical imaging works at the same magnitude. Micro-computed tomography of bone reports trabecular volume and porosity in cubic millimetres, tumour volumes in early imaging are given the same way, and voxel sizes in high-resolution scans are quoted as fractions of one. In each case the unit is small enough to describe structure rather than merely size.
Its identity with the microlitre is worth remembering when moving between fields. An engineer discussing a cubic millimetre of material and a biologist discussing a microlitre of solution are talking about the same quantity, and any calculation that mixes the two needs no conversion factor at all.
One cubic millimetre equals 1 microlitre, 0.001 cubic centimetres, 0.000000001 cubic metres, or about 0.000061 cubic inches.
The quart in the imperial system is a unit of volume equal to exactly 1136.5225 millilitres. Its symbol is qt. It is two imperial pints and a quarter of an imperial gallon, and its name says so: quart comes from the Latin quartus, a fourth. It sits between the pint and the gallon and, in Britain, it has lost to both.
Its decline is the clearest case of a unit being squeezed out from both sides. The pint survived because it is the legal measure for draught beer and because a person can hold one; the gallon survived in fuel economy figures. The quart is neither drunk nor driven, so nothing kept it in daily speech, and British shops now describe the same quantity as a litre or as two pints.
In the United States the same name is thriving. A United States liquid quart is 946 millilitres, and milk, cream, stock, ice cream, paint and motor oil are all sold in that size. An engine oil change is quoted in quarts, five being typical for a car, and the quart carton is one of the most recognisable objects in an American kitchen.
That American survival owes something to the litre. A United States quart is only five per cent smaller than a litre, so shelf sizes barely changed when Canadian and international products moved to metric, and a shopper comparing a quart with a litre is comparing almost the same thing. The imperial quart is thirteen per cent larger than a litre, which made the same substitution less comfortable in Britain.
The dry measure adds a further complication in the United States. A dry quart is 1101 millilitres against the liquid quart's 946, and it belongs to a separate chain used for berries, produce and grain. Nothing on a label distinguishes them, so the same word describes two different quantities depending on whether the contents pour or not.
For conversion, the imperial quart is 1.1365 litres and the United States liquid quart is 0.9464. The rule of thumb that a quart is roughly a litre is safe in America and about a seventh out in Britain, which is exactly the kind of margin that turns a recipe or a chemical dilution wrong without looking obviously wrong.
One imperial quart equals 1136.5225 millilitres, 2 imperial pints, 0.25 imperial gallons, or about 1.201 US liquid quarts.