| Cubic millimeters (mm³) | Gills (gi) |
|---|---|
| 1 Cubic millimeter | 0.00000703901594557 gi |
| 2 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000140780318911 gi |
| 3 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000211170478367 gi |
| 4 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000281560637823 gi |
| 5 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000351950797279 gi |
| 10 Cubic millimeters | 0.0000703901594557 gi |
| 20 Cubic millimeters | 0.000140780318911 gi |
| 25 Cubic millimeters | 0.000175975398639 gi |
| 50 Cubic millimeters | 0.000351950797279 gi |
| 100 Cubic millimeters | 0.000703901594557 gi |
| Reference | Cubic millimeters (mm³) | Gills (gi) |
|---|---|---|
| A teaspoon | 5000 mm³ | 0.0351951 gi |
| A can of soft drink | 330000 mm³ | 2.32288 gi |
| A wine bottle | 750000 mm³ | 5.27926 gi |
| A bathtub | 150000000 mm³ | 1055.85 gi |
| An Olympic swimming pool | 2.5 × 1012 mm³ | 17597540 gi |
The cubic millimetre is a unit of volume equal to one thousandth of a cubic centimetre, written mm³. It is the volume of a cube one millimetre on each side, and it is exactly one microlitre. Which of the two names is used depends on whether the thing being measured is a solid or a liquid, and the distinction is entirely a matter of professional habit.
Machining measures productivity in it. The material removal rate of a milling cutter or a grinding wheel is quoted in cubic millimetres per minute, and that single figure captures what a machine and a tool can achieve better than spindle speed or feed rate can on their own. Comparing two cutting strategies, two tool coatings or two machines means comparing how many cubic millimetres of metal each turns into swarf per unit time.
Additive manufacturing inverts the same measurement. A fused-filament printer deposits ten to twenty cubic millimetres a second, a laser powder-bed machine rather less, and build time follows directly from the part volume divided by that rate. Because the volume of a component is known exactly from its model, the estimate is unusually reliable.
Wear and durability testing uses the unit to describe loss. A specific wear rate is stated in cubic millimetres removed per newton of load and metre of sliding, which allows materials of very different hardness to be compared on one scale. Bearing life, brake pad testing and coating evaluation all reduce to counting cubic millimetres that are no longer there.
Medical imaging works at the same magnitude. Micro-computed tomography of bone reports trabecular volume and porosity in cubic millimetres, tumour volumes in early imaging are given the same way, and voxel sizes in high-resolution scans are quoted as fractions of one. In each case the unit is small enough to describe structure rather than merely size.
Its identity with the microlitre is worth remembering when moving between fields. An engineer discussing a cubic millimetre of material and a biologist discussing a microlitre of solution are talking about the same quantity, and any calculation that mixes the two needs no conversion factor at all.
One cubic millimetre equals 1 microlitre, 0.001 cubic centimetres, 0.000000001 cubic metres, or about 0.000061 cubic inches.
The gill is a unit of volume equal to a quarter of an imperial pint, or exactly 142.0653125 millilitres. Its symbol is gi. It is five imperial fluid ounces, and it sits between the fluid ounce and the pint in the old British liquid chain. Its name is pronounced with a soft g, so that it sounds like the name Jill, which surprises most readers who meet it only in print.
For most of the twentieth century it governed the British pub. Spirits were served in fractions of a gill, and the fraction varied by region: a sixth of a gill in England and Wales, a fifth in Scotland, and a quarter in Northern Ireland. A traveller ordering the same drink in three cities therefore received three different quantities, all legally correct and all described by the same words.
That system ended in 1995, when the United Kingdom replaced the gill fractions with metric measures of 25 or 35 millilitres, each establishment choosing one and displaying which. The change was less disruptive than it looked, because a fifth of a gill is 28.4 millilitres and a quarter is 35.5, so the new measures sat close to the old ones and the drinks barely changed size.
Cookery kept it longer than the law did. British and Irish recipes written before the 1970s call for a gill of cream, stock or milk, and the quantity is a quarter pint, which is 142 millilitres. Anyone working from an inherited recipe book meets the word regularly, and the conversion is one of the few worth writing on the flyleaf.
The American gill is a different quantity again. It is a quarter of a United States liquid pint, therefore four United States fluid ounces or 118.3 millilitres, about a sixth smaller than the imperial gill. It appears in old American recipes and in the occasional bar manual, and the same caution applies as with the pint: the name says nothing about which system is meant.
Today the gill survives in dialect, in historical writing and in the specifications of glassware sold for period use. It is one of the clearest cases of a unit outliving its own function, kept alive by cookbooks and by the memory of how a drink used to be poured.
One imperial gill equals 142.065 millilitres, 5 imperial fluid ounces, 0.25 imperial pints, or about 1.201 US gills.