| Yottabits (Ybit) | Megaoctets (Mo) |
|---|---|
| 1 Yottabit | 1.25 × 1017 Mo |
| 2 Yottabits | 2.5 × 1017 Mo |
| 3 Yottabits | 3.75 × 1017 Mo |
| 4 Yottabits | 5 × 1017 Mo |
| 5 Yottabits | 6.25 × 1017 Mo |
| 10 Yottabits | 1.25 × 1018 Mo |
| 20 Yottabits | 2.5 × 1018 Mo |
| 25 Yottabits | 3.125 × 1018 Mo |
| 50 Yottabits | 6.25 × 1018 Mo |
| 100 Yottabits | 1.25 × 1019 Mo |
| Reference | Yottabits (Ybit) | Megaoctets (Mo) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.28 × 10-21 Ybit | 0.00016 Mo |
| A three-minute MP3 | 2.4 × 10-17 Ybit | 3 Mo |
| A smartphone photo | 3.2 × 10-17 Ybit | 4 Mo |
| A high-definition film | 3.2 × 10-14 Ybit | 4000 Mo |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 4 × 10-13 Ybit | 50000 Mo |
The yottabit is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand zettabits — a one followed by twenty-four zeros. Its symbol is Ybit. For thirty years it was the largest unit the metric system offered, and it describes a quantity of data that does not yet exist anywhere.
A yottabit is 125 zettaoctets. The total of all data held by humanity is currently estimated in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, so the world's entire stock of information is somewhere around one or two yottabits. It is the first data unit that is genuinely larger than the thing it might describe, which is what makes it interesting.
The prefix yotta was adopted in 1991 at the 19th General Conference on Weights and Measures, alongside zetta. The names were invented rather than derived: the Greek and Latin numerals had been used up by peta and exa, and the committee needed letters that were not already taken as unit symbols. Y and Z were among the few remaining, and the syllables were built around them.
For a long time the yotta prefix marked the top of the ladder, and it appeared mainly in speculation and in claims about intelligence agencies' storage plans that turned out to be exaggerated. Then in 2022 the General Conference added ronna and quetta above it, together with ronto and quecto below, because data quantities were rising fast enough that the top was in sight.
Reaching a yottaoctet of storage with current technology would be a physical undertaking. Even at the highest densities available, it would require hundreds of millions of the largest hard drives ever made, a power supply comparable to that of a small country, and a building programme lasting decades. The constraint is not the mathematics but the silicon and the electricity.
The unit is nevertheless properly defined and a converter must handle it, both because forecasts of future data growth are written in yottaoctets and because the metric system's rule is that every prefix applies to every unit. A quantity does not need to exist for its name to be well formed.
One yottabit equals 1,000 zettabits, 125 zettaoctets, or about 0.8272 yobibits.
The megaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to one million octets, or eight million bits. Its symbol is Mo. It is the unit of the individual file: a photograph, a song, a document, an application download are all sized in megaoctets, which makes it the most frequently read data unit in daily life.
The typical figures are worth carrying in the head. A photograph from a phone is 2 to 5 megaoctets, a raw photograph from a system camera 25 to 50. A compressed song is 3 to 10. A minute of high-definition video is around 100. A long text document is under one. An operating system update is several thousand, which is why it is quoted in gigaoctets instead.
The megaoctet also carries the most notorious unit error in computing history. The 1.44 MB floppy disc holds neither 1.44 million octets nor 1.44 times 1,048,576. Its capacity is 1,440 kibioctets, which is 1,474,560 octets — the manufacturers multiplied a binary kilo by a decimal thousand and produced a figure that is correct in no system at all. It remains the standard illustration of why the IEC prefixes were needed.
Compact discs are cleaner: a standard disc holds about 700 megaoctets of data, or 74 to 80 minutes of audio, and that capacity was the practical limit for distributing software for a decade. Before them, distributing a program meant a box of floppies, and after them a DVD held about 4.7 gigaoctets, nearly seven times as much.
Memory sizes reached megaoctets in the early 1990s and stayed there for a decade. Four megaoctets was a comfortable amount in 1993 and inadequate by 1998, which tracks the arrival of graphical interfaces and the web. Today a single browser tab routinely holds more memory than an entire computer of that era.
The decimal-binary gap matters at this scale. A megaoctet is a million octets, but a mebioctet is 1,048,576, and a file reported as 100 MB by one program may appear as 95.4 MB in another. The difference is 4.9 per cent, small enough to overlook and large enough to cause arguments about whether a download completed correctly.
One megaoctet equals 1,000,000 octets, 1,000 kilooctets, 8 megabits, or about 0.9537 mebioctets.