| Yobibits per second (Yibit/s) | Octets per second (octet/s) |
|---|---|
| 1 Yobibit per second | 1.51115727452 × 1023 octet/s |
| 2 Yobibits per second | 3.02231454904 × 1023 octet/s |
| 3 Yobibits per second | 4.53347182355 × 1023 octet/s |
| 4 Yobibits per second | 6.04462909807 × 1023 octet/s |
| 5 Yobibits per second | 7.55578637259 × 1023 octet/s |
| 10 Yobibits per second | 1.51115727452 × 1024 octet/s |
| 20 Yobibits per second | 3.02231454904 × 1024 octet/s |
| 25 Yobibits per second | 3.7778931863 × 1024 octet/s |
| 50 Yobibits per second | 7.55578637259 × 1024 octet/s |
| 100 Yobibits per second | 1.51115727452 × 1025 octet/s |
| Reference | Yobibits per second (Yibit/s) | Octets per second (octet/s) |
|---|---|---|
| A dial-up modem | 4.63221 × 10-20 Yibit/s | 7000 octet/s |
| Typical home broadband | 8.27181 × 10-17 Yibit/s | 12500000 octet/s |
| Gigabit Ethernet | 8.27181 × 10-16 Yibit/s | 125000000 octet/s |
| Streaming a 4K film | 2.06795 × 10-17 Yibit/s | 3125000 octet/s |
The yobibit per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to two to the eightieth power bits per second, which is 1,024 zebibits per second. Its symbol is Yibit/s. It is the largest binary transfer rate the International Electrotechnical Commission has named, and the binary counterpart of the yottabit per second.
At this final step the binary and decimal conventions differ by 20.9 per cent, and that number is the conclusion of the argument the IEC prefixes were created to settle. A naming habit that was 2.4 per cent wrong at the kibibit has grown, through eight successive multiplications by 1.024, into a discrepancy of more than a fifth. No measurement system can carry an ambiguity that large.
The unit describes nothing. Global internet traffic runs at roughly an exabit per second, so a yobibit per second is over a million times the total communication of the human species. No link, no aggregate and no forecast reaches it, and none is expected to.
The binary series stops here because the decimal series stopped at yotta when the IEC standard was written in 1998. When ronna and quetta were added to the metric system in 2022, no matching binary names were defined, so a rate of two to the ninetieth bits per second has no accepted short form. That gap will presumably be filled if it is ever needed, which at present it is not.
Defining a rung of a ladder nobody has climbed still has a purpose. A system whose names run out forces its users to improvise, and improvised extensions conflict; writing the whole series out in advance means the rule, rather than a table of exceptions, is all anyone has to learn. That is the same reasoning that gave the metric system its complete prefix set.
For any reader of technical material the lesson of the whole binary series is a single character. Kibit/s, Mibit/s, Gibit/s, Tibit/s, Pibit/s, Eibit/s, Zibit/s and Yibit/s are binary; kbit/s, Mbit/s, Gbit/s, Tbit/s, Pbit/s, Ebit/s, Zbit/s and Ybit/s are decimal; and the difference between them widens from a rounding error to a fifth as you climb.
One yobibit per second equals 1,024 zebibits per second, 151,115,727,451,828,646,838,272 octets per second, or about 1.209 yottabits per second.
The octet per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to eight bits per second. Its symbol is octet/s. It is the unit in which software reports transfer speeds, as against the bits per second in which hardware and network services advertise them, and the factor of eight between the two conventions is the source of endless confusion.
The division of labour is consistent once it is understood. Anything describing a physical link — an Ethernet port, a fibre connection, a radio channel, a broadband package — is quoted in bits per second, because bits are what the signalling actually carries. Anything describing a file moving from one place to another is quoted in octets per second, because files are measured in octets.
A download manager that reports 12 megaoctets per second on a connection sold as 100 megabits per second is not disagreeing with the advertisement; it is stating the same rate in the other convention, and the arithmetic between them is a division by eight. Recognising this immediately removes the most common cause of complaint about internet speed.
Individual octets per second appear in the same narrow places as individual bits: deep-space telemetry, low-power sensor links, and the slowest legacy serial connections. A rate of a hundred octets per second would move a page of text in about twenty seconds, which was a normal experience in the 1970s and is unimaginable now.
The unit also underlies the way disc and interface throughput is described. A drive that sustains 500 megaoctets per second is moving four gigabits per second across its interface, and matching the two figures is a routine part of system design: an interface rated in gigabits must be compared with a drive rated in octets, and the factor of eight decides whether one starves the other.
Storage tools reinforce the convention. Every file copy utility, backup program and command-line transfer tool reports in octets per second or its multiples, and every network measurement tool reports in bits per second. A person reading both at once has to keep the conversion in mind, which is exactly what makes the distinction worth stating explicitly.
One octet per second equals 8 bits per second, 0.008 kilobits per second, or 0.001 kilooctets per second.