| Kilobits (kbit) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|
| 1 Kilobit | 1.25 × 10-22 Yo |
| 2 Kilobits | 2.5 × 10-22 Yo |
| 3 Kilobits | 3.75 × 10-22 Yo |
| 4 Kilobits | 5 × 10-22 Yo |
| 5 Kilobits | 6.25 × 10-22 Yo |
| 10 Kilobits | 1.25 × 10-21 Yo |
| 20 Kilobits | 2.5 × 10-21 Yo |
| 25 Kilobits | 3.125 × 10-21 Yo |
| 50 Kilobits | 6.25 × 10-21 Yo |
| 100 Kilobits | 1.25 × 10-20 Yo |
| Reference | Kilobits (kbit) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.28 kbit | 1.6 × 10-22 Yo |
| A three-minute MP3 | 24000 kbit | 3 × 10-18 Yo |
| A smartphone photo | 32000 kbit | 4 × 10-18 Yo |
| A high-definition film | 32000000 kbit | 4 × 10-15 Yo |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 400000000 kbit | 5 × 10-14 Yo |
The kilobit is a unit of digital information equal to one thousand bits. Its symbol is kbit. The lowercase k matters: it marks the decimal kilo of the metric system, one thousand exactly, as distinct from the binary 1,024 that the capital K sometimes indicated in older computing usage.
That distinction was fought over for decades. Memory is built in powers of two, so a chip holding 1,024 bits was called a kilobit chip, and the name stuck even though the number was wrong by 2.4 per cent. Storage and transmission, meanwhile, always counted in true thousands. The IEC settled the matter in 1998 by naming the binary quantity a kibibit, leaving the kilobit to mean one thousand and nothing else.
For a sense of scale, a kilobit holds 125 octets, which is about 125 characters of unaccented text — roughly a long sentence, or the length of a short social-media post. A single low-resolution photograph is thousands of times larger. The kilobit is a unit for things that were once considered generous and are now considered trivially small.
Its historical home was the telephone modem. Dial-up connections were rated in kilobits per second, and the numbers marked the era precisely: 300 bits per second in the late 1970s, then 1.2, 2.4, 9.6, 14.4, 28.8 and finally 56 kilobits per second, the last of which pushed an ordinary voice line to its theoretical ceiling. Anyone who used the internet before broadband measured their experience in these numbers.
The kilobit survives in audio and video encoding, where bit rates are quoted in kilobits per second. Speech codecs used in telephony run from 8 to 64. Music encoded at 128 kilobits per second was the early standard for portable players, 192 and 256 are common now, and 320 is the practical ceiling for the older lossy formats. Video runs a decimal order higher, in megabits.
Memory chip capacities are still occasionally described in kilobits, particularly for small serial memories used in embedded devices, where a 64-kilobit part holds 8 kilooctets of configuration data. In those specifications the figure is usually the binary one, so the datasheet is worth reading carefully.
One kilobit equals 1,000 bits, 125 octets, or about 0.9766 kibibits.
The yottaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand zettaoctets, or a septillion octets — a one followed by twenty-four zeros. Its symbol is Yo. Nothing that exists is measured in yottaoctets; the unit describes a quantity of data the world has not yet produced.
The total data held by humanity is currently estimated in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, so the world is a small fraction of the way to its first yottaoctet. On the growth rates of the last two decades, that threshold would be crossed sometime in the 2040s, though every long-range forecast in this field has been wrong in both directions.
The physical obstacles are severe. At the storage densities of current hard drives, a yottaoctet would need something like a hundred billion units. Manufacturing them at present rates would take centuries, powering them would need the electrical output of many countries, and housing them would require a building programme without precedent. The number is not absurd, but it is far beyond the current industrial base.
Research into higher-density storage exists partly because of this ceiling. DNA data storage, which encodes information in synthetic genetic sequences, offers densities millions of times higher than magnetic media, and a yottaoctet of DNA would fit in a room rather than a continent. Reading and writing it remain slow and costly, but the density argument is what keeps the field funded.
The yottaoctet also appears in claims that turn out to be exaggerated. Reports that intelligence agencies were building yottaoctet-scale facilities circulated widely in the 2010s and were not supported by the construction, the power supply or the storage market. Any claim about a yottaoctet of anything can be checked against total world manufacturing, which is a useful discipline.
Between 1991 and 2022 the yotta prefix was the top of the metric ladder, which is why it was the natural unit for speculative claims. The addition of ronna and quetta in 2022 gave the system three more decimal orders above it, and it is telling that this was done partly because data quantities were approaching the old ceiling.
One yottaoctet equals 1,000 zettaoctets, 1,000,000,000,000,000 gigaoctets, 8 yottabits, or about 0.8272 yobioctets.