| Square kilometers (km²) | Square hectometers (hm²) |
|---|---|
| 1 Square kilometer | 100 hm² |
| 2 Square kilometers | 200 hm² |
| 3 Square kilometers | 300 hm² |
| 4 Square kilometers | 400 hm² |
| 5 Square kilometers | 500 hm² |
| 10 Square kilometers | 1000 hm² |
| 20 Square kilometers | 2000 hm² |
| 25 Square kilometers | 2500 hm² |
| 50 Square kilometers | 5000 hm² |
| 100 Square kilometers | 10000 hm² |
| Reference | Square kilometers (km²) | Square hectometers (hm²) |
|---|---|---|
| A sheet of A4 paper | 0.00000006237 km² | 0.000006237 hm² |
| A tennis court | 0.0002608 km² | 0.02608 hm² |
| A football pitch | 0.00714 km² | 0.714 hm² |
| One hectare | 0.01 km² | 1 hm² |
| Central Park, New York | 3.41 km² | 341 hm² |
The square kilometre is a unit of area equal to one million square metres, or one hundred hectares. It is written km². It is the area of a square one kilometre on a side, and it is the unit in which countries, cities, lakes, forests and administrative districts are measured almost everywhere in the world.
Its main work is geography. Monaco covers about 2 square kilometres, Manhattan about 59, Greater London around 1572, and France some 551,500. Because the unit spans that whole range without changing, it makes very different places directly comparable, which is why atlases, censuses and statistical yearbooks settle on it rather than on hectares above and square metres below.
Population density is its most quoted derived figure. Dividing inhabitants by square kilometres produces a number that is meaningful at every scale: a few per square kilometre across Mongolia or the Australian interior, a few hundred across most of western Europe, and eight thousand or more in Singapore and central Paris. The same arithmetic done in square miles gives figures 2.6 times larger, which is a common source of confusion in translated sources.
It is worth being careful about the phrasing. A square kilometre is one kilometre by one kilometre. An area described as two kilometres square is two kilometres on each side and therefore four square kilometres, not two. The distinction sounds pedantic until a fire, a flood or a proposed development is being described, at which point the difference is a factor of the side length itself.
Environmental and infrastructure figures live here. Rainfall converts neatly: one millimetre falling on one square kilometre is a thousand cubic metres, or a million litres of water. A utility-scale solar farm producing a gigawatt at peak needs roughly twenty square kilometres of ground. Wildfire extent, glacier retreat, deforestation and sea-ice cover are all reported in square kilometres because that is the resolution at which satellites usefully see them.
Against imperial units it faces the square mile, which is 2.59 square kilometres. Because a square mile also equals 640 acres, the three units chain together awkwardly, and any figure that has passed through more than one of them is worth checking. Below the square kilometre, land measurement passes to the hectare, and one square kilometre is exactly one hundred of them.
One square kilometre equals 1,000,000 square metres, 100 hectares, about 0.386 square miles, or about 247.1 acres.
The square hectometre is a unit of area equal to ten thousand square metres. It is written hm², and it is the area of a square one hundred metres on a side, since a hectometre is one hundred metres. It is exactly one hectare, and the two names describe the same quantity by two different routes.
The routes are worth distinguishing. The hectare is built by putting the prefix hecto in front of the are, so it is a hundred ares. The square hectometre is built by squaring a prefixed length, which is how the International System forms every derived area. The second construction is the strictly coherent one; the first is the one written on every land title in the world.
That difference explains where each name is found. Hectare appears in agriculture, forestry, planning, taxation and international statistics. Square hectometre appears mainly in technical and cartographic work in Spanish-speaking countries, where the hectometre is a familiar prefixed length for other reasons, and in documents where an author has chosen to keep every unit inside strict SI form.
The related cubic form is genuinely common in one field. Spanish and Latin American hydrology reports reservoir capacity and river flow in cubic hectometres, a cubic hectometre being one million cubic metres, so a reservoir holding 500 hm³ is holding half a cubic kilometre of water. Readers used to seeing hm in that context find hm² unremarkable, which is much of why the form survives there and almost nowhere else.
For scale, ten thousand square metres is a square one hundred metres on a side. That is about one and a half association football pitches, a large city block, or a good-sized field. It is the largest area that can still be walked around comfortably in a couple of minutes, and it is where land measurement stops being architectural and starts being agricultural.
When converting, the two names need no arithmetic between them: one square hectometre is one hectare exactly. Going further, multiply by ten thousand for square metres or divide by a hundred for square kilometres, and remember that the imperial comparison, 2.471 acres, is the same for both names.
One square hectometre equals 10,000 square metres, 1 hectare, 0.01 square kilometres, or about 2.471 acres.