Conversion from 4 Yottabits per second to Kibioctets per second

=

Invert

Formula to convert Yottabits per second (Ybit/s) to Kibioctets per second (Kio/s)

More information

Yottabits per second to Kibioctets per second conversion table

Yottabits per second (Ybit/s)Kibioctets per second (Kio/s)
1 Yottabit per second1.220703125 × 1020 Kio/s
2 Yottabits per second2.44140625 × 1020 Kio/s
3 Yottabits per second3.662109375 × 1020 Kio/s
4 Yottabits per second4.8828125 × 1020 Kio/s
5 Yottabits per second6.103515625 × 1020 Kio/s
10 Yottabits per second1.220703125 × 1021 Kio/s
20 Yottabits per second2.44140625 × 1021 Kio/s
25 Yottabits per second3.0517578125 × 1021 Kio/s
50 Yottabits per second6.103515625 × 1021 Kio/s
100 Yottabits per second1.220703125 × 1022 Kio/s

Data-transfer rate reference points

ReferenceYottabits per second (Ybit/s)Kibioctets per second (Kio/s)
A dial-up modem5.6 × 10-20 Ybit/s6.83594 Kio/s
Typical home broadband1 × 10-16 Ybit/s12207 Kio/s
Gigabit Ethernet1 × 10-15 Ybit/s122070 Kio/s
Streaming a 4K film2.5 × 10-17 Ybit/s3051.76 Kio/s

Try our other unit converters

LengthMassTemperatureEnergyVolumeSpeedTimeDataPressureFrequencyData-transfer rateVolumetric flow rateAngleArea

Information about the Yottabit per second (Ybit/s)

The yottabit per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to a thousand zettabits per second. Its symbol is Ybit/s. For thirty years it was the largest rate the metric system could name, and it describes a speed that has no application anywhere: not in engineering, not in research, and not in any forecast that anyone takes seriously.

Its distance from reality is easy to state. Global internet traffic averages roughly one exabit per second, so a yottabit per second is about a million times the combined communication of the entire human species. The largest single link ever built runs at a few hundred terabits per second, which is a ten-billionth of this figure.

The unit is nonetheless properly defined, and that completeness is the point. The metric system's rule is that every prefix combines with every unit without exception, so a reader who has never seen Ybit/s can decode it from the prefix alone. A system with gaps would need a table of which combinations are legal, and a table is exactly what a rule-based system exists to avoid.

There is a physical way to think about the number. A yottabit per second is 125 zettaoctets per second, and the total quantity of data humanity has ever stored is a few hundred zettaoctets. A link at this rate would therefore transmit the entire accumulated information of the species in a couple of seconds. No such body of data exists in one place to be sent, and nothing at the far end could receive it.

The prefix yotta was adopted in 1991 alongside zetta, at a conference that also had to consider which letters remained free. It stood at the top of the metric ladder until 2022, when ronna and quetta were added above it, partly because data quantities were beginning to approach the old ceiling. Rates have not followed quantities upward at the same pace.

For a converter, handling the unit is a matter of consistency rather than utility. A tool that converts every metric prefix correctly does not need to decide which of them anyone will use, and a figure written in yottabits per second — however unlikely — converts by the same rule as any other.

One yottabit per second equals 1,000 zettabits per second, 125 zettaoctets per second, or about 0.8272 yobibits per second.


Information about the Kibioctet per second (Kio/s)

The kibioctet per second is a unit of data transfer rate equal to 1,024 octets per second, and therefore to 8,192 bits per second. Its symbol is Kio/s. Unlike most of the binary rate units it is genuinely common, because the command-line tools that copy, download and synchronise files have reported in it for decades.

The reason is straightforward. Those tools count what they have moved in blocks, and blocks are powers of two. A program that reads in four-kibioctet pieces and divides the total by elapsed time produces a rate in kibioctets per second, and reporting it in decimal kilooctets would require an extra multiplication for no benefit. The unit is what the arithmetic naturally produces.

Anyone who has watched a file copy on a Unix-like system has seen the figure. Download utilities, archive tools, disc-writing commands and network file transfer programs all report progress in kibioctets or mebioctets per second, and most of them label it correctly with the lowercase i. It is one of the few places where the IEC prefixes are used consistently in everyday software.

For scale, a kibioctet per second moves about a thousand characters of text each second: a short letter in a second, a novel in about ten minutes. It is a rate at which a modern web page will not load in any reasonable time, so seeing it in a progress display usually means something has gone wrong with the connection rather than that the transfer is nearly finished.

The difference from a kilooctet per second is 2.4 per cent, which nobody notices. The value of using the binary unit here is not accuracy but honesty: the number came from a binary computation, and writing it with a binary prefix says so. A reader who wants the decimal figure can convert; a reader given a decimal label for a binary number cannot recover anything.

Comparing the reading with an advertised connection speed requires two steps: multiply by eight to get bits, and adjust by 2.4 per cent for the base. In practice the second step is beneath the noise of any real measurement, and the first is the one that matters.

One kibioctet per second equals 1,024 octets per second, 8,192 bits per second, or 1.024 kilooctets per second.