Conversion from 20 Bits to Zebibits

=

Invert

Formula to convert Bits (bit) to Zebibits (Zibit)

More information

Bits to Zebibits conversion table

Bits (bit)Zebibits (Zibit)
1 Bit8.47032947254 × 10-22 Zibit
2 Bits1.69406589451 × 10-21 Zibit
3 Bits2.54109884176 × 10-21 Zibit
4 Bits3.38813178902 × 10-21 Zibit
5 Bits4.23516473627 × 10-21 Zibit
10 Bits8.47032947254 × 10-21 Zibit
20 Bits1.69406589451 × 10-20 Zibit
25 Bits2.11758236814 × 10-20 Zibit
50 Bits4.23516473627 × 10-20 Zibit
100 Bits8.47032947254 × 10-20 Zibit

Data reference points

ReferenceBits (bit)Zebibits (Zibit)
A plain text message (160 characters)1280 bit1.0842 × 10-18 Zibit
A three-minute MP324000000 bit2.03288 × 10-14 Zibit
A smartphone photo32000000 bit2.71051 × 10-14 Zibit
A high-definition film3.2 × 1010 bit2.71051 × 10-11 Zibit
A dual-layer Blu-ray disc4 × 1011 bit3.38813 × 10-10 Zibit

Try our other unit converters

LengthMassTemperatureEnergyVolumeSpeedTimeDataPressureFrequencyData-transfer rateVolumetric flow rateAngleArea

Information about the Bit (bit)

The bit is the fundamental unit of information. Its symbol is bit, and its name is a contraction of binary digit, coined by the statistician John Tukey and put into print by Claude Shannon in his 1948 paper A Mathematical Theory of Communication, the work that founded information theory.

A bit is the amount of information carried by a single choice between two equally likely possibilities. A coin landing heads or tails, a switch open or closed, a voltage high or low: each of those settles one bit. That definition is what makes the bit a unit rather than a mere convention of notation. It measures how much uncertainty an answer removes, and it does so in a way that is independent of what the question was about.

Shannon's insight was that this could be counted. A message drawn from an alphabet of thirty-two equally likely symbols carries five bits per symbol, because thirty-two is two to the fifth. If the symbols are not equally likely — as letters in English are not — the average drops, and that gap between the naive count and the true average is exactly what compression exploits. A well-compressed file is one from which the redundant bits have been removed.

In hardware the bit is a physical state: a charge trapped on a floating gate in flash memory, the direction of magnetisation of a domain on a hard disc platter, a pit or land on an optical disc, a pulse of light present or absent in a fibre. All of these encode the same abstract quantity, which is why data can move between them without loss.

Bits are almost never counted singly in storage. They are grouped into octets of eight, and storage capacity is quoted in octets or their multiples. Transmission is different: network and interface speeds are quoted in bits per second, so a connection described as 100 megabits per second delivers about 12.5 megaoctets per second. Confusing the two is the commonest arithmetic error in the whole field.

Where single bits do get counted is in specifications of precision and range. A colour channel with 8 bits holds 256 levels; one with 10 bits holds 1,024. Audio at 16 bits per sample has about 96 decibels of dynamic range, and at 24 bits about 144. A 64-bit address can name about 18 quintillion locations. In every case, each added bit doubles what can be distinguished.

One bit equals 0.125 octets, 0.001 kilobits, or about 0.0009766 kibibits.


Information about the Zebibit (Zibit)

The zebibit is a unit of digital information equal to two to the seventieth power bits, which is 1,024 exbibits. Its symbol is Zibit. It is the binary counterpart of the zettabit, and the two now differ by 18.1 per cent — nearly a fifth.

That divergence is the reason the binary prefixes were needed at all. At the kibibit the two conventions differed by 2.4 per cent, a rounding error. Here the difference is large enough that a document using the wrong one is simply reporting a different quantity, and no amount of context can repair the ambiguity after the fact.

A zebibit is 147,573,952,589,676,412,928 octets, or 128 exbioctets. Nothing of this size exists. The total data held by humanity is somewhere in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, which is under a zebioctet, so the world's entire information stock does not yet reach one unit at this step of the binary ladder.

The unit exists because the IEC series was defined completely rather than as far as anyone then needed. That is the same principle the metric system follows: every prefix applies to every unit, whether or not the combination has yet been used. A system with holes in it requires a table of exceptions, and a system without holes requires only the rule.

Where the zebibit could genuinely appear is in address space arithmetic. Two to the seventieth is not a natural pointer width, but multiples and fractions of powers of two run through every discussion of addressing, and a scheme that reserved seventy bits for something would naturally be described in these terms. Such schemes are proposed occasionally and none has yet been needed.

Reading the symbol is the practical skill. Zibit is binary, Zbit is decimal, and at eighteen per cent apart the two are not interchangeable in any document where the number matters. Where a source writes ZB with no explanation, there is no way to know which was meant, and the honest response is to treat the figure as uncertain to a fifth.

One zebibit equals 1,024 exbibits, 147,573,952,589,676,412,928 octets, or about 1.181 zettabits.