| Zebibits (Zibit) | Megaoctets (Mo) |
|---|---|
| 1 Zebibit | 147573952589676 Mo |
| 2 Zebibits | 295147905179353 Mo |
| 3 Zebibits | 442721857769029 Mo |
| 4 Zebibits | 590295810358706 Mo |
| 5 Zebibits | 737869762948382 Mo |
| 10 Zebibits | 1.4757395259 × 1015 Mo |
| 20 Zebibits | 2.95147905179 × 1015 Mo |
| 25 Zebibits | 3.68934881474 × 1015 Mo |
| 50 Zebibits | 7.37869762948 × 1015 Mo |
| 100 Zebibits | 1.4757395259 × 1016 Mo |
| Reference | Zebibits (Zibit) | Megaoctets (Mo) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 1.0842 × 10-18 Zibit | 0.00016 Mo |
| A three-minute MP3 | 2.03288 × 10-14 Zibit | 3 Mo |
| A smartphone photo | 2.71051 × 10-14 Zibit | 4 Mo |
| A high-definition film | 2.71051 × 10-11 Zibit | 4000 Mo |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 3.38813 × 10-10 Zibit | 50000 Mo |
The zebibit is a unit of digital information equal to two to the seventieth power bits, which is 1,024 exbibits. Its symbol is Zibit. It is the binary counterpart of the zettabit, and the two now differ by 18.1 per cent — nearly a fifth.
That divergence is the reason the binary prefixes were needed at all. At the kibibit the two conventions differed by 2.4 per cent, a rounding error. Here the difference is large enough that a document using the wrong one is simply reporting a different quantity, and no amount of context can repair the ambiguity after the fact.
A zebibit is 147,573,952,589,676,412,928 octets, or 128 exbioctets. Nothing of this size exists. The total data held by humanity is somewhere in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, which is under a zebioctet, so the world's entire information stock does not yet reach one unit at this step of the binary ladder.
The unit exists because the IEC series was defined completely rather than as far as anyone then needed. That is the same principle the metric system follows: every prefix applies to every unit, whether or not the combination has yet been used. A system with holes in it requires a table of exceptions, and a system without holes requires only the rule.
Where the zebibit could genuinely appear is in address space arithmetic. Two to the seventieth is not a natural pointer width, but multiples and fractions of powers of two run through every discussion of addressing, and a scheme that reserved seventy bits for something would naturally be described in these terms. Such schemes are proposed occasionally and none has yet been needed.
Reading the symbol is the practical skill. Zibit is binary, Zbit is decimal, and at eighteen per cent apart the two are not interchangeable in any document where the number matters. Where a source writes ZB with no explanation, there is no way to know which was meant, and the honest response is to treat the figure as uncertain to a fifth.
One zebibit equals 1,024 exbibits, 147,573,952,589,676,412,928 octets, or about 1.181 zettabits.
The megaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to one million octets, or eight million bits. Its symbol is Mo. It is the unit of the individual file: a photograph, a song, a document, an application download are all sized in megaoctets, which makes it the most frequently read data unit in daily life.
The typical figures are worth carrying in the head. A photograph from a phone is 2 to 5 megaoctets, a raw photograph from a system camera 25 to 50. A compressed song is 3 to 10. A minute of high-definition video is around 100. A long text document is under one. An operating system update is several thousand, which is why it is quoted in gigaoctets instead.
The megaoctet also carries the most notorious unit error in computing history. The 1.44 MB floppy disc holds neither 1.44 million octets nor 1.44 times 1,048,576. Its capacity is 1,440 kibioctets, which is 1,474,560 octets — the manufacturers multiplied a binary kilo by a decimal thousand and produced a figure that is correct in no system at all. It remains the standard illustration of why the IEC prefixes were needed.
Compact discs are cleaner: a standard disc holds about 700 megaoctets of data, or 74 to 80 minutes of audio, and that capacity was the practical limit for distributing software for a decade. Before them, distributing a program meant a box of floppies, and after them a DVD held about 4.7 gigaoctets, nearly seven times as much.
Memory sizes reached megaoctets in the early 1990s and stayed there for a decade. Four megaoctets was a comfortable amount in 1993 and inadequate by 1998, which tracks the arrival of graphical interfaces and the web. Today a single browser tab routinely holds more memory than an entire computer of that era.
The decimal-binary gap matters at this scale. A megaoctet is a million octets, but a mebioctet is 1,048,576, and a file reported as 100 MB by one program may appear as 95.4 MB in another. The difference is 4.9 per cent, small enough to overlook and large enough to cause arguments about whether a download completed correctly.
One megaoctet equals 1,000,000 octets, 1,000 kilooctets, 8 megabits, or about 0.9537 mebioctets.