| Megaoctets (Mo) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|
| 1 Megaoctet | 1 × 10-18 Yo |
| 2 Megaoctets | 2 × 10-18 Yo |
| 3 Megaoctets | 3 × 10-18 Yo |
| 4 Megaoctets | 4 × 10-18 Yo |
| 5 Megaoctets | 5 × 10-18 Yo |
| 10 Megaoctets | 1 × 10-17 Yo |
| 20 Megaoctets | 2 × 10-17 Yo |
| 25 Megaoctets | 2.5 × 10-17 Yo |
| 50 Megaoctets | 5 × 10-17 Yo |
| 100 Megaoctets | 1 × 10-16 Yo |
| Reference | Megaoctets (Mo) | Yottaoctets (Yo) |
|---|---|---|
| A plain text message (160 characters) | 0.00016 Mo | 1.6 × 10-22 Yo |
| A three-minute MP3 | 3 Mo | 3 × 10-18 Yo |
| A smartphone photo | 4 Mo | 4 × 10-18 Yo |
| A high-definition film | 4000 Mo | 4 × 10-15 Yo |
| A dual-layer Blu-ray disc | 50000 Mo | 5 × 10-14 Yo |
The megaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to one million octets, or eight million bits. Its symbol is Mo. It is the unit of the individual file: a photograph, a song, a document, an application download are all sized in megaoctets, which makes it the most frequently read data unit in daily life.
The typical figures are worth carrying in the head. A photograph from a phone is 2 to 5 megaoctets, a raw photograph from a system camera 25 to 50. A compressed song is 3 to 10. A minute of high-definition video is around 100. A long text document is under one. An operating system update is several thousand, which is why it is quoted in gigaoctets instead.
The megaoctet also carries the most notorious unit error in computing history. The 1.44 MB floppy disc holds neither 1.44 million octets nor 1.44 times 1,048,576. Its capacity is 1,440 kibioctets, which is 1,474,560 octets — the manufacturers multiplied a binary kilo by a decimal thousand and produced a figure that is correct in no system at all. It remains the standard illustration of why the IEC prefixes were needed.
Compact discs are cleaner: a standard disc holds about 700 megaoctets of data, or 74 to 80 minutes of audio, and that capacity was the practical limit for distributing software for a decade. Before them, distributing a program meant a box of floppies, and after them a DVD held about 4.7 gigaoctets, nearly seven times as much.
Memory sizes reached megaoctets in the early 1990s and stayed there for a decade. Four megaoctets was a comfortable amount in 1993 and inadequate by 1998, which tracks the arrival of graphical interfaces and the web. Today a single browser tab routinely holds more memory than an entire computer of that era.
The decimal-binary gap matters at this scale. A megaoctet is a million octets, but a mebioctet is 1,048,576, and a file reported as 100 MB by one program may appear as 95.4 MB in another. The difference is 4.9 per cent, small enough to overlook and large enough to cause arguments about whether a download completed correctly.
One megaoctet equals 1,000,000 octets, 1,000 kilooctets, 8 megabits, or about 0.9537 mebioctets.
The yottaoctet is a unit of digital information equal to a thousand zettaoctets, or a septillion octets — a one followed by twenty-four zeros. Its symbol is Yo. Nothing that exists is measured in yottaoctets; the unit describes a quantity of data the world has not yet produced.
The total data held by humanity is currently estimated in the low hundreds of zettaoctets, so the world is a small fraction of the way to its first yottaoctet. On the growth rates of the last two decades, that threshold would be crossed sometime in the 2040s, though every long-range forecast in this field has been wrong in both directions.
The physical obstacles are severe. At the storage densities of current hard drives, a yottaoctet would need something like a hundred billion units. Manufacturing them at present rates would take centuries, powering them would need the electrical output of many countries, and housing them would require a building programme without precedent. The number is not absurd, but it is far beyond the current industrial base.
Research into higher-density storage exists partly because of this ceiling. DNA data storage, which encodes information in synthetic genetic sequences, offers densities millions of times higher than magnetic media, and a yottaoctet of DNA would fit in a room rather than a continent. Reading and writing it remain slow and costly, but the density argument is what keeps the field funded.
The yottaoctet also appears in claims that turn out to be exaggerated. Reports that intelligence agencies were building yottaoctet-scale facilities circulated widely in the 2010s and were not supported by the construction, the power supply or the storage market. Any claim about a yottaoctet of anything can be checked against total world manufacturing, which is a useful discipline.
Between 1991 and 2022 the yotta prefix was the top of the metric ladder, which is why it was the natural unit for speculative claims. The addition of ronna and quetta in 2022 gave the system three more decimal orders above it, and it is telling that this was done partly because data quantities were approaching the old ceiling.
One yottaoctet equals 1,000 zettaoctets, 1,000,000,000,000,000 gigaoctets, 8 yottabits, or about 0.8272 yobioctets.